We are still getting new, but sketchy information from the
press about the attack on the Air Products plant in France yesterday. Most
commentators are linking this attack with a suicide bombing attack on a mosque
in Kuwait and an attack by two gunmen on tourists in Tunisia that also occurred
yesterday. The Islamic State has apparently only taken credit for the suicide
bombing.
News reports from the Washington
Post and the Daily
Mail both claim that yesterday’s attacker was a known delivery driver at
the facility. The Post article is reporting that the French authorities are now
saying that the attacker entered the facility normally and then accelerated into
the building. Allowing a known delivery driver into a facility with minimal scrutiny
is a fairly routine practice unless a facility is in a high-state of alert.
News reports continue to describe an explosion associated
with this attack. The Post article
quotes a French official as saying:
“A security camera, he said, showed
Salhi’s vehicle accelerating toward a covered shed, sparking an explosion. A
part of the shed was destroyed in the explosion, the back of the vehicle was
destroyed and the roof disintegrated.”
With the alleged explosion affecting the back of the vehicle
rather than the front, it would seem that an explosive device of some kind was
in the vehicle. If that was the case, it would have to have been small or only
partially functioning since it appears that the driver was unharmed. Until
someone describes the type of explosion or device, I am still reluctant to conclude
that an actual explosive device was included in the attack. I still think that
the ‘explosion’ was the sound of the truck hitting the metal sided building.
No comments:
Post a Comment