Two weeks ago Sen. Thune (R,SD) introduced S 1611, the Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 2015. This is the Senate version of the annual
authorization bill. Unlike the House version (HR 1987 which passed
in the House last month) there are two sections in this bill that will
effect maritime transportation of hazardous chemicals. They deal with fishing
vessels and with enforcement of hazardous material transportation law.
Fishing Vessels
Section 303 of the bill would amend 46
USC 3702, addressing the carriage of liquid bulk dangerous cargoes by
fishing vessels. It would add a new paragraph (c) to that section that would
generally exempt fishing or fish tender vessels from the provisions of 46
USC Chapter 37 when those vessels are “engaged only in the fishing industry”
{new §3702(c)(1)}.
That exemption would not apply if “the vessel is carrying flammable or
combustible liquid cargoes in bulk” {new §3702(c)(2)}.
Enforcement
Section 304 would add a new section to 49
USC Chapter 51, Transportation of Hazardous Materials. The new §5129 would require the
Secretary of Transportation and the DHS Secretary to “establish policies and
practices to ensure that the authorities set forth in this chapter are enforced
in the same manner and to the same extent, and the civil and criminal penalties
are assessed or recommended in the same manner and to the same extent”.
Markup Hearing
The bill was marked
up by the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee on June 25th.
A number of amendments were offered and accepted by voice vote, but only one
may be of specific interest to readers of this blog. The amendment
was offered by Sen. Peters (D,MI) and Sen. Johnson (R,WI) and would require a
report to Congress on the assessment of the effectiveness of the oil spill
response activities specific to the Great Lakes.
The bill was adopted by the Committee by voice vote.
Moving Forward
This bill will move to the full Senate, probably after the
summer recess. There is a good chance that the bill will be considered as
expeditiously as the House version was. The two versions would then be reconciled
in Conference.
No comments:
Post a Comment