Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) announced
the approval of a revision of a PHMSA information collection request supporting
the Approvals program for hazardous materials. The revision was needed because
of changes in reporting requirements for those seeking fireworks approvals
included in the HM-257
final rule published in July, 2013.
According to the supporting
data [.DOC download] submitted by PHMSA the new reporting requirements are
expected to only affect 211 of the 11,074 Approvals applicants. The new
requirements would result in an additional five minutes on each of the 24.5
(average) requests for approvals for each these applicants. This would increase
the total hour burden estimate by 430 hours to 28,270 hours.
Commentary
This is a totally unremarkable revision of a long-standing
ICR and as such I would typically ignore this, especially considering that OIRA
approved the ICR revision without change for the standard three years. What
caught my attention, however, was the fact that the ICR revision was requested
on May 29th, 2014. This completely
unremarkable ICR revision took over a year to approve, even after OIRA had
signed off on the data during
the rulemaking process just 5 months before this request was submitted.
Short of a congressional investigation or a GAO audit (often
a precursor to such an investigation) we will never know why this ICR approval
took so long. It is, however, part of a long history of slow movement in OIRA
on conducting approvals of what are supposed to simple administrative reviews of
whether or not an Agency has dotted all the “i’s” and crossed all the “t’s” in
justifying collecting information from the public.
Many times we can clearly see that the delays are
politically driven (see the still unapproved ICR for the CFATS personnel surety
program), but that does not seem to be the situation here. While there were
some objections in the fireworks community to some of the provisions of the
HM-257 rulemaking, those controversies were effectively settled by the
publication of the rule.
Perhaps it is time for somebody in Congress to start asking
questions about the ICR approval process and the lengthy delays being
experienced in the OIRA’s reviews.
No comments:
Post a Comment