Saturday, November 7, 2026

Hot Box Explosion

There were news reports (here, here, and here) of an explosion at a chemical facility in Mississippi involving a herbicide being heated in a hot box. As is typical for such news reports, there were few details involved and the authorities (public and private) only provided the vaguest of information. So, let’s take a general look at ‘hot box’ operations. 

Hot Box Basics  

Chemicals are frequently stored in portable containers in solidified form or in a very viscous state that are difficult to remove from containers. Thus, there is a need for facilities to heat those containers to empty them. Typically, a ‘hot box’ is used. 

Now I have used ‘hot boxes’ that were nothing more than a heavy tarp and a steam hose. If there is a frequent need for such container heating, there are more sophisticated options available. They will typically include a closeable metal box (with or without insulation), heat source (steam or electric), and some sort of temperature control system. 

Allow for container venting, place in the hot box, apply heat and wait. When the container is heated through, it is removed from the hot box, and the contents can be poured or pumped out. More sophisticated systems will include temperature probes to put into the container to monitor the heating. 

Safety Issues  

The most obvious safety issue is pressure buildup. Heating any gas will increase the pressure in a closed system. A properly designed hot box will have some sort of safety venting, frequently just an opening to the atmosphere. Portable containers do not have such venting designed in. Pressure relief valves are, however, available that can be screwed into bung holes on the container. Or the top can be simply loosened. 

Another potential safety issue is the rise of a flammable atmosphere. While most people have a tendency to ignore flashpoints over 100°F, if the temperature in the hot box is above the flashpoint of any of the materials being heated in the hot box, there may be a flammable atmosphere in the box. The question that needs to be answered in that case is if the hot box has been designed for operation in a classified atmosphere so that the heating system or the box electronic controls cannot ignite that atmosphere. 

Another issue that must be considered is chemical compatibility when multiple products are put into the hot box at the same time. Potential gas phase interactions need to be considered at the operating temperature to be found in the box when the containers are vented inside the box. 

The final issue has only recently become a more public concern; the security of the electronic control systems (if present) on the box. Recent attacks on controllers for commercial freezers have shown that temperature controllers are potentially subject to electronic attacks. Since it is becoming obvious that anything can be hacked, safety considerations need to take into account the maximum temperature that can be reached within the hot box. 

Review – Public ICS Disclosures – Week of 10-31-26

This week we have 19 vendor disclosures from ABB, Core Temp, Hitachi, Johnson Controls (2), Pheonix Contact (3), Sick, WAGO (2), WatchGuard (5), Welotec, and Zyxel (2). There were five updated advisories from Moxa (2) and Siemens (3). Finally, we had six researcher reports from Bitsight, Claroty, Cydome, SEC Consult, and ZDI (3). 

The list of disclosures was published over at CFSN Detailed Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/public-ics-disclosures-10-31-26 - and was emailed to paid subscribers today. Free subscribers will receive copies on Monday. Subscribe today.  

Short Takes – 11-7-26 - Space Geek Edition

Is the south pole the right place for a lunar base? TheSpaceReview.com article. Pull quote: “” However, the south pole of the Moon still has the rugged terrain and challenging lighting conditions that make landings difficult. At some point, NASA may need to weigh those technical risks with the political risks of seeing a Chinese crew land first. 

Cosmic rays could scar the heart, raising risks for Mars-bound astronauts, rat study hints. LiveScience.com article. Pull quote: “The research, published Sept. 30 in the journal PLOS One, found that rats exposed to levels of radiation similar to what an astronaut might experience on a long-term trip to Mars developed more scar tissue around the small blood vessels of their hearts than rats that were not exposed to this radiation. This scar tissue is indicative of a condition known as cardiac fibrosis, which is known to increase the risk of heart failure.” 

Starfish Space’s first Otter servicing spacecraft fails. SpaceNews.com article. Pull quote: “Starfish Space continues to operate its Otter Pup 2 spacecraft, launched in June 2025. That spacecraft was originally intended to rendezvous and dock with an ION orbital transfer vehicle from D-Orbit, but that company backed out of those plans. Otter Pup 2 would instead approach ElaraSat MMS-1, a spacecraft built by Australian company Gilmour Space and launched last year.” 

NASA telescope reenters Earth’s atmosphere. TheHill.com article. Pull quote: “The Swift Observatory, an aging NASA telescope barely clinging to space after a failed rescue effort, reentered Earth’s atmosphere Wednesday morning over the North Sumatra region of Indonesia at 7:39 a.m. EST, according to the space agency.” 

Do we know how many Starship launches SpaceX will need to get NASA astronauts to the moon? Space.com article. Pull quote: “But keep in mind: None of this is set in stone. If SpaceX can't demonstrate that its orbital refueling strategy works, or if it can't pull off an uncrewed lunar landing mission by the end of next year, NASA could still select Blue Origin's Blue Moon lander for Artemis IV — assuming Blue Moon is able to check its required boxes in time.” 

James Webb Space Telescope uncovers new clues about the origins of 'interstellar invader' comet 3I/ATLAS. Space.com article. Pull quote: “On the other hand, the results imply that 3I/ATLAS was formed around its star of origin from similar icy material to that which produced some of the TNOs in our solar system, showing that the building blocks of planets around other stars share a common range of properties with the building blocks that formed our solar system. Indeed, 3I/ATLAS could even be a fragment of a TNO-like body that was shattered in a collision.” 

OMB Approves FRA Safety System Info Protection NPRM

Thursday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a notice of proposed rulemaking from the DOT’s Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) on “Litigation Protections for System Safety Program and Risk Reduction Program Information”. The NPRM was sent to OIRA on September 28th, 2026. 

According to the 2026 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking: 

“This rulemaking would propose revising 49 CFR 270.105 and 271.11 [links added] to broaden the scope of railroad safety risk reduction program information protected from use in litigation.  The rulemaking would do so by removing the limitation that the protected information must have been compiled or collected solely” for a railroad safety risk reduction program purpose.” 

I suspect that the effects of this rulemaking on railroad hazmat safety will be tangential at best, so I am not sure that I will be covering its publication in any detail. At the very least, however, I will announce its publication in the appropriate Short Takes post. 

Friday, November 6, 2026

Review - PHP Fallout in Control Systems - 11-6-26

 Yesterday I published a free article over on CFSN Detailed Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/php-fallout-in-control-systems-11 - that updated my previous list of PHP2Shell advisories that had been published by control-system related vendors. I noted that: 

“We are continuing to see control system related vendors publishing new advisories and updated advisories for the two PHP2Shell vulnerabilities. Here is a non-exhaustive listing of both from the last week.” 

Chemical Transportation Incidents – Week of 10-3-26

Reporting Background 

See this post for explanation, with the most recent update here (removed from paywall). 

Data from PHMSA’s online database of transportation related chemical incidents that have been reported to the agency. 

Incidents Summary  

  • Number of incidents – 505 (474 highway, 25 air, 6 rail, 0 water) 
  • Serious incidents – 5 (4 Bulk release, 0 evacuation, 0 injury, 0 death, 2 major arteries closed, 3 fire/explosion, 25 no release)  
  • Largest container involved – 26,387-gal DOT 111A100W1 Railcar {Diesel Fuel} Damaged manway gasket and loose manway bolts. 
  • Largest amount spilled – 3,800-gal Tank Truck {Argon, Refrigerated Liquid (Cryogenic Liquid)} Trailer damaged in rollover accident. 
  • Total amount reported spilled in all incidents – 7128.6-gal 

NOTE: Links above are to Form 5800.1 for the incident described. 

Most Interesting Chemical: Tars, Liquid Including Road Oils and Cutback Bitumens: No CAMEO description (Source: CameoChemicals.NOAA.gov).  


INSERT UN 1999 Placard 

 
/* Use this with templates/template-twocol.html */