Last month, Sen Cruz (R,TX) introduced S 5045, the Safe and Secure Transportation of American Energy Act. The bill would amend 49 USC 60123(b) to expand the coverage of ‘the penalty for damaging or destroying an interstate pipeline’ to include select civil disobedience activities. No new funding is authorized by this legislation.
Moving Forward
Cruz is the Ranking Member of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee to which this bill was assigned for consideration. This (along with his 10 Republican cosponsors who are also members of the Committee) means that there may be sufficient influence to see the bill considered in Committee. I suspect, however, that there would be nearly party-line opposition to the bill as the proposed language appears to be directly targeting recent civil disobedience activities by environmental activists and Indian tribes who oppose the construction or expansion of the energy pipelines. I do not expect this bill to be taken up by the Committee.
Commentary
While it is easy to understand why pipeline owners,
contractors and the industries that rely on such pipelines object to the civil
disobedience activities that have delayed construction and impeded operations
of hazardous material pipelines, I cannot comprehend how anyone can justify
punishing the perpetrators by imprisonment for up to 20 years for such
activities. This is especially true when owner/operator violations of safety
standards under §60118(a)
are limited to punishment under §60123(a) of no more than 5-years imprisonment.
No comments:
Post a Comment