This afternoon the folks at ISCD published their latest CFATS
Update showing the current status of site security plans and the number of
facilities covered under the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS)
program. As we have seen over the last year or so, there has been a continued
steady increase in the number of facilities that have had their site security
plans authorized and approved.
Current SSP Statistics
ISCS is still not including in this update either an
accounting of the number or status of facilities that have undergone a CFATS
compliance inspection; the next step in the CFATS process. With less than 300
facilities yet to receive SSP authorization (and many of these may not have yet
reached the point in the CFATS process where they have even submitted SSPs for
review) I would expect more attention to have been applied to the compliance inspection
portion of the program.
Covered Facilities
We are continuing to see a steady decline in the number of
facilities that are still covered under the CFATS program. This month I have
changed the graph to only show the data since January 2014 since there was a
significant change (acceleration) in the rate of decline starting at that point
(I described this in an
earlier post).
I did a simple statistical analysis of the data provided in
the chart above looking at the rate of change. Using the simple linear analysis
tools in MS Excel® I determined the equation for that rate of decline and the R2
value for that regression.
y = -63.025x + 4353
where: y = the number of covered facilities and
x = the number of months
since January 2014
The R2 value for this data set is R² = 0.9867. My
statistics professor from a couple of decades ago considered an R2
of > 0.99 to indicate a significant correlation between the two sets of
data; this is pretty close. If this correlation continues (a BIG IF; no cause
and effect relationship has been established) we could expect there to be no
facilities in the CFATS program after sometime in the middle of October 2019.
This is, of course, a pretty silly application of
statistical analysis, but since we have no statistical data from ISCD on the
reasons for removal from the CFATS program we are reduced to playing these
types of analytical games.
Expedited Approval
Facility Process
With more than 91% of the currently covered facilities
having an authorized site security plan under the current CFATS program, it
would seem that there is much less need for the Expedited
Approval Facility (EAF) process required by HR 4007. Depending on the
actual content of the EAF requirements to be published next month by ISCD it might
be easier for facilities with authorized SSPs to continue in the current
approval process than change their existing plans to conform to the EAF plan.
A quick reminder hear, HR 4007 specifically provides ISCD
with the authority {§2102(c)(4)(B)(ii)}
to publish the EAF plan requirements without going through the publish and
comment process required for a normal change in regulations. The deadline for
the publication of the EAF guidance document is June 16th and Tier 3
and 4 facilities without an approved SSP have 30 days (July 16th) to
decide if they want to use the EAF process instead of the standard SSP approval
process.
While I suspect that there has been some discussion with
industry about the EAF process there have been no public statement from DHS
about how this program will work. I’m pretty sure that some of the procedural
details are still being worked out.
No comments:
Post a Comment