Earlier this month Rep. Lofgren (D,CA) introduced HR 2402,
the Protecting Critical Infrastructure Act. The bill would create a new
class of controlled unclassified information (CUI) to protect information
sharing within the bulk power distribution system and with Federal, State and
local government agencies.
In many ways the bill shares elements in common with HR
2271 and S
1068, but there are two major differences. First there is no authorization
for the Secretary of Energy to take any actions to protect cybersecurity.
Second instead of recognizing the current Critical Energy Infrastructure
Information (CEII) category of CUI it constructs a new category out of whole
cloth.
Protected Electric
Security Information
As I have mentioned in other blogs the current CEII would be
classified as CUI
Basic under the rulemaking on CUI currently being undertaken by the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) of the OMB. This means that
the NARA regulations would govern markings, protective measures, classification
authority and declassification authority for CEII.
This bill, on the other hand would establish a new category
of CUI, Protected Electric Security Information (PESI) as a matter of law. That
would place PESI in the CUI Specified category. This means that the NARA CUI
regulations (when finalized, maybe next year) would only govern those aspects
of security not specifically covered in this bill or subsequent regulations
issued in accordance with this bill.
The information protection items specifically addressed in
the bill include:
∙ Protection from disclosure under
Federal, State and local freedom of information rules {new §215A(a)(1)};
∙ Duration of protection, maximum 5
years §215A(a)(6)};
∙ Early declassification authority,
resides in FERC §215A(a)(7)};
∙ Judicial review process §215A(a)(8)};
Additionally, FERC is given authority to draft regulations
governing the sharing of CEII information between and amongst government
agencies (at all levels in the US) and private entities, as well as with Mexican
and Canadian authorities as necessary.
Moving Forward
Neither Lofgren nor her cosponsor {Rep. Gowdy (R,SC)} are
members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee so it is unlikely that this
bill will make it to committee consideration, especially considering that sponsors
of HR 2271 are on that Committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment