Today the DHS Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD)
posted a new fact
sheet on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Knowledge
Center. The fact sheet deals with
the implementation of Risk-Based Performance Standard (RBPS) #9, Response in
developing a site security plan (SSP) for a CFATS covered facility.
Generally speaking, there not much new here that is not
already covered (in slightly more detail) in the RBPS
Guidance Document. The one exception is that the fact sheet stresses that
there are differences between Security Response Plans and Emergency Response
Plans, but that both are required portions of the response planning necessary
for site security plans.
One piece of discussion is glaringly missing from the Fact
Sheet, the need to plan for backup power, communications and process safeguards.
Physical attacks (and natural disasters) are very likely to have negative
affects upon these critical areas and any response or recovery plan is going to
have to address those necessities.
Both documents fail to completely address coordination with
State and local authorities. While they do mention fire, police and emergency
medical services, they fail to discuss the role of Local
Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) in emergency response planning. While
not every community has an active LEPC, CFATS facilities should make a positive
effort to reach out to whatever LEPC is active in their community to ensure
that adequate coordination is made between all effected and affected agencies.
Finally, local hospital emergency departments (with an
emphasis on multiple facilities) in the area need to be notified of any
chemicals held on site that could require specific (and/or unusual) medical
technologies to treat exposed individuals. Where expensive and/or
short-shelf-life kits (see my
discussion about cyanide kits, for example) the local medical community
needs to be aware of these measures so that they can either ensure there is a
local stockpile available or that appropriate sharing agreements are initiated.
No comments:
Post a Comment