This is part of a continuing series of blog posts on the
public comments filed in the previous week for the Coast Guard’s TWIC
Reader NPRM. The previous posts in the series are listed below.
There were 10 comments posted this week, a record for this
docket but hardly a major closing comment period for a rule that has been as
long awaited or as recently debated in Congress as this one. Maybe the port security community knows more
about the TWIC Reader than does Congress or the GAO.
Address GAO Report
Concerns
A chemical
bulk terminal operator recommends that the final rule be delayed until the
Coast Guard and TSA have a chance to address the concerns expressed in the
recent GAO report on the TWIC Reader Pilot. This argument was also raised by a member
of Congress, a barge
operator.
Expand TWIC Reader
Requirements
A port
security consultant recommends that the TWIC Reader requirements be
extended to any Group B or C facility that shares a fence line with a Risk
Group A facility. They argue that the common fence line would be easier to
access from a lower risk facility if that facility does not require biometric
verification of identity and TWIC status. They also argue that each Risk Group
B and C facility be required to have one portable TWIC Reader available to
respond to sudden changes is security situation that might require the deployment
of a TWIC Reader.
An identification
card vendor association make the point that Congress did not specify
differing security standards based upon some arbitrary risk group ranking. They
note that the use of the TWIC as a visual flash pass ID makes it no more useful
than any other printed ID card.
Multiple Entries
The chemical bulk terminal operator recommends that the
multiple entry rule be changed to require that only during the initial entry to
a facility in a 24-hour period should an individual have to utilize a TWIC
Reader to gain access. During subsequent entries the TWIC could be used as a
flash pass in accordance with USCG Policy Advisory Council (PAC) 08-09 [No link
available, I’m sorry, but the CG Homeport page does not provide for permanent
links to documents].
A local
water taxi company makes a point made in multiple earlier comments that
requiring the showing of a TWIC upon every entry to secured spaces on smaller
vessels with limited crews makes no sense.
Exempt Smaller Facilities
A marine
service organization thinks that automatically making barge fleeting
facilities that handle Certain Dangerous Cargo (CDC) Risk Group A facilities
ignores the security realities of these facilities, particularly the limited access
that is available. An Alaskan
cruise line operator expresses the same concern for small cruise
facilities.
Crewmember Definition
The barge operator would like to see the final rule include
a definition of ‘crewmember’ based upon the definition in Navigation Vessel
Inspection Circular 03-07. This is particularly important when considering the
14-crewmember exemption for requiring a TWIC Reader on Risk Group A vessels.
No comments:
Post a Comment