The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has
updated their web site with additional information about tomorrow’s hearing on “Oversight
of Federal Risk Management and Emergency Planning Programs to Prevent and
Address Chemical Threats, Including the Events Leading Up to the Explosions in
West, TX and Geismar, LA”.
The witness list is now up on the web site. Witnesses
include:
• Rafael Moure-Eraso, Chemical
Safety Board;
• Barry Breen, Environmental
Protection Agency;
• Randall Sawyer, Contra Costa
County, CA;
• Rick Webre, Ascension
Parish, LA;
• Paul Orum, Coalition to Prevent
Chemical Disasters;
• M. Sam Mannan, Mary Kay O'Connor
Process Safety Center; and
• Kim Nibarger, United
Steelworkers International Union
Well, this hearing is certainly not going to be about the
West Fertilizer explosion; no one (with the exception of Mr.Moure-Eraso) has
anything to do with the regulation of West Fertilizer, the emergency response
to the accident, or the investigation of the incident. It’s not even about the
Geismar, LA explosion; the sole Louisiana representative on the witness list is
from the State Department of Homeland Security, mainly an emergency response
agency.
As I noted in an earlier
blog post about this hearing this is going to be a hearing about inherently
safer technology (IST). Both Orum and Mannan have a long history of being very
intelligent advocates for the implementation of IST; Orum more from a political
point of view and Mannan from a chemical process point of view. Contra Costa
County has an effective regulatory program stongly encouraging IST
implementation. The United Steelworkers have also been long time political
advocates for the mandatory implementation of IST programs.
I certainly believe that a coherent discussion of IST as
part of a chemical safety program is important. The use of these two particular
incidents, however, seems to be particularly inappropriate particularly where
IST is a code-word for chemical substitution. There is no substitute chemical for
ammonium nitrate fertilizer for a distributor whose customers want ammonium
nitrate fertilizer. Propylene and ethylene (we are still not sure which was at
root cause of the Geismar explosion) are a basic chemical feedstocks for which
there is not viable substitute.
Sen. Boxer (D,CA), the Committee Chair, has also been a
long-time proponent for mandatory IST implementation. Given that there are no
IST opposition voices included on the witness list and no chemical industry
representatives, I expect that this will be a very one-sided hearing that will
conclude that IST is the be-all and end-all of chemical/environmental safety.
That is a shame as it will only contribute to the polarization of what should
be a cooperative debate on the subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment