This is part of a continuing series of blog posts on the
public comments filed in the previous week for the Coast Guard’s TWIC
Reader NPRM. The previous posts in the series are listed below.
Half-way through the 60-day
comment period on this notice of proposed rulemaking and the Coast Guard has
received its first corporate comments. The four comments received in the last
week were from:
• Passenger
Vessel Association; and
The comments from the Lake
Carriers’ Association were generally positive, supporting the failure to
require TWIC readers for Risk Group B and C vessels and facilities. The
American Institute of Architects comment was a copy of a slide presentation
about TWIC Readers used in a continuing education course. The IBIA comments
included a suggestion that the Coast Guard should expand the TWIC Reader
requirement to include Risk Group B vessels and facilities. The Passenger
Vessel Association comment objected to the use of the TWIC as an access control
tool (instead of just a proof of vetting document) and suggested that the
recurring access provisions include in the ANPRM should be restored,
particularly for passenger vessels and terminals.
The IBIA comments were actually
a copy of the prepared remarks that they presented at the TWIC
Reader Meeting in Arlington, VA on April 18th. Unfortunately,
the Coast Guard has yet to publish the transcripts of the comments from that
meeting or the Houston, TX meeting on April 25th (okay, I’ll give
them that that was just last week).
I expect that we will be seeing
more corporate comments like these as we approach the end of the comment period
on May 21st.
No comments:
Post a Comment