This is part of a continuing series of blog posts looking at
the responses to a joint request for information (RFI) from the National
Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to support their development of
incentives to adopt the improved cybersecurity practices being developed by the
NIST as part of the Cybersecurity Framework mandated by the President’s
executive order on cybersecurity (EO 13636).
The previous post in the series is listed below.
This week there were only two responses to the RFI. They
came from a lawyer, Gary Fresen, and from the Advanced Cyber Security Center
(ACSC).
Private Sector
Information Sharing Centers
The ACSC
response proposes the establishment of four regional private sector
entities to provide a forum for the discussion and dissemination of
cybersecurity information including threat and response information. It notes
that these regional information sharing centers would be patterned on their
organization which has successfully set up a forum in the Boston area for this
type of information sharing with weekly meetings allowing face to face
exchanges.
Privileged
Communications
Mr. Fresen proposes
setting up a new class of privileged communications that would allow for the
internal collection and analysis of cybersecurity information in critical
infrastructure organizations and the privileged sharing of that information
with the appropriate ISACs and CERTSs. The detailed proposal includes
legislative language for the establishment of that new class of privileged
communications.
Moving Forward
As I noted in my
post about the RFI the short deadline for this RFI is necessitated by the
time constraints set forth in the Executive Order. It may be disappointing to
see only a total of three comments submitted to date, it usually takes at least
a month for corporate type responses to these RFI. With only nine-days left in
the comment period, I suspect that we will be seeing a number of comments
coming in the next week.
No comments:
Post a Comment