In researching my post
on Saturday about the OMB’s extension of Bakken train notification ICR I
had a chance to read the joint
comments [.PDF download] submitted about that ICR extension by the
Association of American Railroad (AAR) and the American Short Line and Regional
Railroad Association (ASLRRA). The authors had requested that the OMB keep the
comments confidential because of the inclusion of two documents marked For
Official Use Only (FOUO). For some reason the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) did not honor that request.
The Documents
The titles of the two documents are listed below (sorry no
links are available):
∙ (U//FOUO) Increased Use of Railways to Transport Crude Oil May
Lead to Acts of Environmental Extremism, FBI Private Sector Advisory, July 18,
2014; and
∙ (U)
Situational Awareness: Potential Threat to Freight Rail, TSA Intelligence Note,
March 31st, 2014
The reason that they were included in the AAR/ASLRRA
comments can be summed up by a quote from the FBI Advisory:
“Extremists may use publically
available information to identify potential transportation routes or to target
new or existing terminals, facilities, businesses, or funding entities
associated with the oil industry through actions intended to cause economic
losses.”
The AAR/ASLRRA comment on the ICR made the point that based
on this information and that found in the TSA intelligence note, that routing
information should be considered Sensitive
Security Information and thus protected from public release. While the DOT
has made highly-hazardous flammable train (HHFT) routing information SSI, the
reporting requirements of that provision will not take effect until April 1st
2016.
Environmental
Activists
Most people in the environmental activist community have two
reasons to object to the continuing use of unit oil trains. First is their
opposition to the use of crude oil products for energy purposes as they
contribute to the increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere;
both when it is produced and transported and when it is used as an energy source.
Secondly, they are concerned about the effects on the environment of the spills
and fires that accompany crude oil train derailments.
Typically the types of actions that they take to express
their opposition include letter writing campaigns on regulations like the
recent HHFT regulations (something like 90,000+ comments were submitted), media
campaigns, and civil disobedience type activities like those seen
last week.
As with any large group of activists (and the environmental
movement is quite large and well funded) there is a small subset that is no
longer satisfied with the progress that is being made by legal action and civil
disobedience. It is this fringe element that the FBI was addressing in their
advisory. Even those fringe elements are unlikely to try to cause a derailment
that could result in an oil spill/fire.
I would not be surprised to hear that these extreme elements
might try to cause damage to tracks or trains that would stop or delay the
delivery of crude oil. My concern would be that because of a basic
misunderstanding of the physics of train operations that they would do some
sort of damage with the intent of stopping a train that would actually derail a
train because the crew did not have enough time to safely stop the train.
Terrorists
There is a very small subset of the fringe of the
environmental activist community that would feel justified in creating a local
environmental catastrophe if it would lead to the shutdown of the crude oil
trains. Most of these environmental terrorists have taken on relatively small
targets with arson attack (car dealerships and expensive vacation
developments). A derailment attack on a crude oil train would be a major
escalation for these folks.
The TSA Note points at a more likely terrorist attacker,
those trained by the Islamic State (IS). The Note shows an improvised explosive
device that would seem to be designed for this type of attack; a magnetic
sticky bomb. These devices have been captured in India where they were intended
to be deployed against rail tank cars. There are no reports of attacks where
they have actually been used and I have my doubts about their utility against
even DOT 111 tank cars for a number of technical reasons.
Having said that, it is clear that rails are susceptible to
any number of derailment type attacks that have been employed in various places
around the world. Almost any of these types of attacks could be employed
against a crude oil unit train with fairly spectacular results.
Fortunately to date the IS related attacks or planned
attacks in this country have been conducted or planned by IS wannabes, not actual
trained IS operatives. The type of people that we have seen in these operations
have been ill-equipped by training or experience to conduct an effective attack
on a crude oil train. Until we see IS or other jihadi extremist group start
exporting trained teams to the United States it would seem unlikely that the
crude oil trains would be targeted by their US grown compatriots.
No comments:
Post a Comment