A DOT
press release today reports that the Federal Railroad Administration has
published a new Emergency Order (Docket Number DOT-OST-2014-0067) setting
emergency response notification requirements for railroads hauling crude oil
trains consisting of 35 or more railcars (or 1,000,000 gal) of Bakken crude
oil. Additionally FRA and the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety
Administration issued a joint safety advisory (SA #: 2014-01) for railroads
transporting Bakken crude oil.
Emergency Order
While the PR reports that the FRA “has issued” the Emergency
Order it is not found on the DOT or FRA web site. The docket number listed in
the PR looks like one of the docket numbers used on the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (www.Regulations.gov), as of
20:30 CDT there is nothing listed for the docket number. Nor is there a listing
that the Emergency Order is scheduled to be printed in tomorrow’s Federal
Register, a pre-requisite for effective Emergency Order.
According to the PR the Emergency Order will require
railroads operating crude oil trains carrying Bakken crude oil to provide each “SERC
[State Emergency Response Commissions] notification regarding the expected
movement of such trains through the counties in that state”. The Emergency
Order lists the following information as being required in those notifications:
• Estimated volumes of Bakken crude
oil being transported;
• Frequencies of anticipated train
traffic:
• Route through which Bakken crude
oil will be transported; and
• Contact information for at least
one responsible party at the host railroads.
Since I haven’t seen the actual Emergency Order yet, I can’t
tell for sure, but it looks like the Emergency Order does not require providing
schedules for the movement of such unit trains. Many local government officials
and emergency planners have been asking for this type of information for years
on hazardous material shipments.
It is also not clear if the Emergency Order provides any information
sharing protections to providers of this information. The standard Federal
Rules do not apparently apply as the information disclosure is being made to a
State not Federal agency. This information protection issue has always been the
railroad’s strongest argument against the mandate of information disclosure.
Safety Advisory
While the Emergency Order is not currently available, the Joint Safety Advisory has
been published on the FRA web site. The SA ‘advises’ and ‘encourages’ railroads
and crude offerors to “select and use the railroad tank car designs with the
highest level of integrity reasonably available [emphasis
added] within their fleet” for shipment of Bakken Crude. It also recommends
against the use of “older, legacy DOT Specificaiton 111 or CTC 111 tank cars”
for that material.
FRA and PHMSA are paying the price for their inaction on the
long known DOT 111 tank car problem. These cars are a major portion of the
current rail tank car fleet and would normally be expected to remain in full
service for a number of years. If FRA and/or PHMSA were to try to immediately
eliminate the use of these cars for crude oil shipments a major reduction in
the number of cars available for crude oil shipments; a reduction that would
severely curtail those shipments. Economically this would be a non-starter.
Moving Forward
Given the publication schedule for the Federal Register, it
is possible that the Emergency Order may be published Friday, but it is more
likely to appear in the Monday FR.
No comments:
Post a Comment