The internet is a wonderful tool; it allows me wide access
to a lot of information. It also allows people to contact me with strange and
peculiar questions. I had an interesting one today from someone who stumbled
across my blog while researching improvised chemical munitions. It seems that
the writer is trying to help a doctor identify a chemical that a postal worker
was exposed to a year and a half ago.
Before I go any further, I want to warn readers that I have
no way of verifying any of this information, nor do I intend to try. The story
has enough verisimilitude that it serves an illistratative purpose. I have
added some details to the story that was relayed to me; I did so to make some
points and I don’t believe that they detract from the background information.
And apparently the proper authorities have already been approached with the
story, so this will not affect any official investigation that may or may not
be under way.
The Story
Back in February 2011 at a postal facility in Orlando,
Florida a package fell off one of the processing lines at the facility and was
damaged. The package contained two bottles that were apparently wired together
and at least one was damaged enough to leak. A dark noxious liquid leaked from
the package. A postal worker donned a pair of gloves, cleaned up the mess, made
the appropriate reports and the liquid container was placed in a Hazmat receptacle.
The employee washed up and went home with a headache. The employee is now under
the care of a physician who is trying to figure out what the chemical was so
that he can properly treat the employee’s symptoms.
We have all seen enough news reports and have laughed often
enough at the over reaction of people to know what should have happened. The fire department and police should have
been notified that there was a suspicious chemical exposure incident. The
employees should have been evacuated and people in chemical suits should have
been expected to go into the building to secure the suspect chemical to test it
to see whether or not it was dangerous. The exposed employee should have been
decontaminated at the scene and taken to the local emergency room for
appropriate diagnostics and treatment.
That apparently did not happen in this instance, I suspect
because too many postal employees have been made fun of by the late night comedians
because they over reacted to flour or powdered sugar. There may have been a
report made, but my email writer can find no organization that has any record
of conducting an investigation.
Now the reason that I was contacted was that the return
address on the package was apparently from Yemen. My correspondent has a
military background and a suspicious nature (some law enforcement training I
think) and began to think that the chemicals may have been an improvised
chemical munition. I mean, why else would someone be sending bottles of
chemicals from Yemen? Okay, a home remedy from mom; a special sauce for a
native dish; chemical samples for some sort of applications testing (this is more
common than one might think); there are all sorts of legitimate reasons. But
the possibility of chemical weapons led them to me.
The Problem
Now, there are innumerable incidents where people in the
shipping industry are exposed to chemicals that were improperly packed and too
carelessly handled. When the chemicals are properly marked, appropriate actions
can be taken to protect the workers involved. The need for decontamination
and/or medical treatment can be properly assessed and responded to.
When there are no markings, one can only assume the worst
and over react. Of course that gets old fast. Most chemicals are not
immediately dangerous or even dangerous over the longer term from a brief
exposure. So just from the random nature of things most over reactions become
fodder for jokes and poking fun at people. And people begin to ignore the
potential hazard until the dangerous situation arrives and smacks someone in
the face; then it is too late.
To be truthful, a package from Yemen containing improperly packaged
and undeclared chemicals should have raised a lot more attention that it
apparently did. Of course, two years ago Yemen wasn’t in the news as much as
today, but even then there was enough talk
about terrorists and Yemen, that someone should have made that potential connection
very quickly. Additional precautions should have been taken, a formal
investigation should have been initiated and the chemical positively identified.
No comments:
Post a Comment