As I noted in an earlier post Sen. Durbin (D,IL) introduced S
1429, Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014. The bill was reported
favorably by the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Cybersecurity
Spending
As expected, there was no specific mention of cybersecurity
programs in the actual bill, spending levels still have not reached that kind
of level. The Committee
Report does, however, contain a number of cybersecurity related line items.
Under the Air Force RDT&E spending (pg 166) the
following line items are listed:
Requested Recommended
169 Cyber Command Activities 68,099,000 38,099,000
170 AF Offensive Cyberspace
Operations 14,047,000 14,047,000
171 AF Defensive Cyberspace
Operations 5,853,000
5,853,000
191 Cyber Security Initiative 2,048,000 2,048,000
192 DOD Cyber Crime Center 288,000
288,000
The $30 million reduction for Cyber Command Activities was
recommended by the Committee. They suggested that this could be achieved by
improving “fund management” and “forward financing” (pg 169) without adversely
impacting program performance.
Under DOD wide RDT&E spending (pgs 173 – 176) the
following cyber items are listed:
Requested Recommended
045 Cyber Security Advanced
Research 19,668,000 19,668,000
116 Cyber Security Initiative 946,000 946,000
220 Cyber Security Initiative 3,658,000 3,658,000
221 Critical Infrastructure
Protection (CIP) 9,752,000 9,752,000
There is no explanation given why there are three different
line items for “Cyber Security Initiative”. It could be three different
programs or a single program with three different funding sources. It would
also help if these spending items were all grouped together, it would make
cyber program tracking much easier.
No Program Comments
There are no program comments on cyber-programs in the
Committee Report, a departure from the practice of recent years. What is
surprising is the lack of reports about cyber issues; these have become a
fixture of DOD appropriations bills. It is hard to tell if this is because the
Committee is completely satisfied with current program performance (unlikely)
or that cybersecurity matters have fallen below the observational threshold. A
more likely possibility is that, because of the NSA monitoring controversy, the
Committee is trying to avoid any discussion of cybersecurity, hoping that the
bill won’t stir up any NSA discussion; a highly unlikely outcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment