Last month, Rep Mace (R,SC) introduced HR 4462, the Election Security Assistance Act. The bill would require DHS and DNI to prepare annual reports to Congress on foreign threats to elections. It would also require CISA and the Election Assistance Commission to establish a voluntary process to test for and monitor covered voting systems for cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Finally, it would require DHS to notify State and local election officials of election cybersecurity incidents. No funding is provided in the bill.
Moving Forward
Mace is not a member of the House Administration Committee to which this bill was assigned for primary consideration, nor is she a member of either the House Homeland Security Committee or the House Permanent Select Intelligence Committee, the two committees that have been assigned secondary consideration of the bill. This means that it is unlikely that there would be sufficient influence to see the bill considered in Committee. I suspect that there would be at least some level of bipartisan support for the bill if it were considered.
Commentary
There are a lot of things missing in this bill, but I will limit this discussion to two topics, coordinated vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
Vulnerability Testing
I understand that vague wording in legislation provides executive agencies with broad leeway to establish an effective program to implement the requirements. This may be a good thing, especially where the agency has technical capabilities and knowledge missing in Congress. Having said that, the broad guidance in §3(a)(1) leaves out a very important component of vulnerability testing, reporting any vulnerabilities to the vendor concerned so that mitigation measures can be developed.
Incident Reporting
The wording of §4 looks like the crafters of this bill were
assuming that intelligence agencies would be the first to discover an election
cybersecurity incident. While cyberattacks by foreign intelligence agencies may
certainly be first discovered by friendly intelligence agencies, a whole host
of other cyberattacks would first be detected by system owners (ransomware
attacks being the most obvious example). With that in mind, this bill should
provide a requirement for reporting of election cybersecurity incidents by State
and local election officials.
For more details about the provisions of the bill, including
suggested language changes for the bill, see my article at CFSN Detailed
Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/hr-4462-introduced
- subscription required.
No comments:
Post a Comment