There are a significant number of hearings scheduled this week
with both the House and Senate in session. Budget hearings predominate, but
none that are of specific interest to readers of this blog. In fact, I do not
see any hearings of specific interest here this week. There are, however, two
bills that will make it to the floor of the House this week that I am watching
and, of course, there is a spending bill deadline approaching at the end of the
week.
On the Floor of the House
There are a number of bills that are scheduled to come to
the floor on Monday under the suspension of the rules provisions of the House.
These provisions limit debate, prohibit floor amendments, and require a
super-majority to pass. Bills of potential interest include:
• HR
5074, the DHS Cyber Incident Response Teams Act of 2018;
Interestingly, both of these bills are listed in the
Majority Leader’s schedule
as being considered “as amended”. The Homeland Security Committee mark-up
hearing for both of these bill resulted in an order for each bill that the
bill be “reported to the House with a favorable recommendation, without
amendment”. No report has been published for either bill (will probably be
submitted today and published later this week), so I cannot tell if Chairman
McCaul (R,TX) subsequently ordered some revisions be made to the bill. It would
not be too unusual for minor technical revisions to be made after mark-up, but
substantial revisions are seldom made.
FY 2018 Spending Bill
The current continuing resolution (CR, HR 1892)
will expire on Friday night. The hope has been that the House and Senate will
consider and pass an omnibus spending bill this week that would include all of
the non-DOD operations of the government (DOD spending was included in the last
CR). News reports (see here
for example) would seem to indicate that there is still some hard negotiating
to be done on this bill.
Is there a chance that there will be another CR? It increasingly
seems that there is always a chance. One remote possibility is that a CR for
the rest of the fiscal year could be passed, keeping the current funding
levels. While the inclusion of DOD spending in HR 1892 would seem to make that
possibility easier, it would violate the agreement to increase spending levels
in non-DOD areas that allowed HR 1892 to eventually be passed.
No comments:
Post a Comment