Today the DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration published a
notice of clarification in the Federal Register (80 FR
63912-63914) concerning aircraft registration requirements for Unmanned
Aircraft Systems. The notice also requests information from the public
necessary for establishing an electronic system for UAS registration and for
determining risk-based criteria for continuing the discretionary exemption for
some UAS.
All Unmanned Aircraft
Systems Must be Registered
The FAA explains in the
notice that:
“To maintain safety in the NAS
[national air space], the Department has reconsidered its past practice of
exercising discretion with respect to requiring UAS to be registered,
consistent with statutory requirements of 49 U.S.C. 44101-44103, and has
determined that registration of all UAS is necessary to enforce personal
accountability while operating an aircraft in our skies.”
The effective date of this change in regulatory enforcement
is today, October 22nd, 2015. To register a small UAS (hobby type
flying device sold at toy stores, malls and hobby shops) you need to go to the
FAA’s Aircraft
Registration: Unmanned Aircraft (UA) web page and scroll down to the
instructions for “To Register a New - Small Unmanned Aircraft (sUA)”. Ignore
the statement at the top of the page that “Registration is not required for
model aircraft”; that was changed by today’s notice and has not made it to the
web site yet.
The FAA notes in today’s notice that “it is apparent that
the current paper-based system for aircraft registration is too burdensome for
small UAS, to include model aircraft”. It is planning to move to an electronic
registration system for small UAS. The FAA
announced Monday that it would be convening a special task force to develop
recommendations for a registration process for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)”.
To assist that task force the included in today’s notice a number of questions
about which it was requesting public feedback. Those questions include:
1. What methods are available for
identifying individual products? Does every UAS sold have an individual serial
number? Is there another method for identifying individual products sold
without serial numbers or those built from kits?
2. At what point should
registration occur (e.g. point-of-sale or prior-to-operation)? How should
transfers of ownership be addressed in registration?
3. If registration occurs at
point-of-sale, who should be responsible for submission of the data? What
burdens would be placed on vendors of UAS if DOT required registration to occur
at point-of-sale? What are the advantages of a point-of-sale approach relative
to a prior-to-operation approach?
4. Consistent with past practice of
discretion, should certain UAS be excluded from registration based on
performance capabilities or other characteristics that could be associated with
safety risk, such as weight, speed, altitude operating limitations, duration of
flight? If so, please submit information or data to help support the
suggestions, and whether any other criteria should be considered.
5. How should a registration
process be designed to minimize burdens and best protect innovation and
encourage growth in the UAS industry?
6. Should the registration be
electronic or web-based? Are there existing tools that could support an
electronic registration process?
7. What type of information should
be collected during the registration process to positively identify the
aircraft owner and aircraft?
8. How should the registration data
be stored? Who should have access to the registration data? How should the data
be used?
9. Should a registration fee be
collected and if so, how will the registration fee be collected if registration
occurs at point-of-sale? Are there payment services that can be leveraged to
assist (e.g. PayPal)?
10. Are there additional means
beyond aircraft registration to encourage accountability and responsible use of
UAS?
Public comments may be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (www.Regulations.gov; Docket # FAA-2015-4378).
Since the Task Force is to complete their report by November 20th,
the FAA is requesting that comments be submitted by November 6th,
2015.
Commentary
The FAA clearly jumped the gun on this process in an attempt
to get a registration process in place before the expected jump in small UAS
sales for Christmas. Unfortunately, they quietly and blatantly ignored a number
of regulatory requirements in their making the effective date of this change in
enforcement effective today.
The first of course deals the fact that they have now made
obsolete the information collection request for Aircraft Registration (2120-0042);
an update of which was just approved on September 30th. The
supporting document submitted to OMB by the FAA projected 206,570 responses per
year for a time burden of 111,154 hours. Those burden estimates were based upon
an extrapolation of documents submitted during the first 10 months of FY 2015.
That means that those burden estimates do not include the
huge number of first time registrations for small UAS. I have no idea how many
of those things are currently in service, but if you include even the smallest
remotely controlled toy helicopters there are probably at least a hundred
thousand UAS (admittedly a number picked out of mid-air, so to speak) currently
in use that have not been registered with the FAA. The FAA clearly needs to
launch a new ICR revision to take these numbers into account before it can
legally require the information to be submitted.
As the FAA explained in their notice using the current paper
based registration process for this huge influx of registration requests is not
an option, but it is the only option currently available. And a truly antiquated
process it is. According to the FAA’s registration
web site:
“You must use an original Aircraft
Registration Application, AC Form 8050-1. We don't accept photocopies or
computer-generated copies of this form. Aircraft Registration Applications may
be obtained from the Aircraft Registration Branch or your local FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO).”
NOTE: The OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) only approved the most recent ICR for Aircraft Registration for 18
months because of the antiquated manual form filling process. OIRA stated “This
collection has been approved for a period of 18 months. Before resubmission,
the agency shall create PDF-Fillable versions of all the forms in this
collection. Further, in conjunction with OMB 2120-0729, the agency shall
evaluate allowing the use of e-signatures in accordance with GPEA. The agency
shall provide a detailed report to OMB with the results of their evaluation and
specific next steps for compliance.”
Fortunately, the other forms that are required in the
registration process are available for download. But all of the completed
documentation needs to be snail mailed to the Aircraft Registration Branch in
Oklahoma City, OK. According to their Aircraft
Registry web site they currently have about a 22 day backlog on registration
processing. How much longer will that backlog be when they start receiving
thousands of UAS application in addition to their standard workload?
The other side of this is that this is going to be a huge
influx of money into the FAA (okay I’m pretty sure that this goes back into the
general Treasury account, but still). There is a $10 fee for obtaining an
N-number (aircraft registration number; starts with the letter ‘N’ hence the
name); which is required before you submit your registration paperwork. And
then there is the $5 registration fee. And the same fees must be paid every
time the UAS is sold or the registration is renewed (every three years). Some
of the newer and smaller versions of the quadcopters do
not cost much more than the price of registration.
The FAA was way too premature in setting an October 22nd,
2015 effective date for the change in their aircraft registration policy. There
is a lot more effort that needs to go into requiring the registration of small
UAS. This had to be clearly understood when they added the 10 questions about
UAS registration to this notice. The FAA clearly has no interest in registering
26mm quad copters, while it may find it necessary to register some pushing the
50-lb small UAS limit. The FAA needs to re-do this notice as a straight request
for information and leave the change in enforcement until they decide which UAS
they really need to register.
Oh, yes, that Task Force? Is there anyone in their right
mind that thinks that a workable document can be crafted by that many people in
that short of time? Really? One that will stand up to implementation in the
real world? By an agency with the technological incompetence of the FAA? I have
some land that I want to sell you about 50 miles south of Key West….
No comments:
Post a Comment