As I noted in an earlier blog post the Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response and Communications will be holding a markup
hearing on Thursday that will look at two bills that I have already covered (HR
3283and HR
4263). They will be considering substitute language in the hearing, so it
seems logical to look at the changes that are already being considered.
HR 3283
The substitute
language for the Integrated
Public Alert and Warning System Modernization Act of 2013 contains the most
modifications of the two bills. It starts out by changing the title slightly to
reflect the change in the year and it eliminates the short hand name for the
new alert system, preferring to use the full descriptive name; the ‘national
integrated public alert and warning system’. Note the use of lower case in the
name throughout the bill, a more formal name is yet to come.
Some relatively minor changes in wording are made in the
findings section of the bill (§2).
For example the words “integration,
flexibility, comprehensiveness” are added to the description of the
expected benefits in §2(2)(A). More significantly there is more emphasis on ‘individuals
with disabilities’ in this section; adding §2(2)(D), “an improved ability to notify individuals with disabilities” to the
description of benefits. Additionally, the coverage of ‘individuals with
disabilities’ is expanded in many places in the bill to specifically address individuals
with “sensory disabilities” {see, for example §2(6)}.
Section 526 that is added to the Homeland Security Act of
2002 has seen extensive revisions. In the paragraph describing the program
implementation requirements {§526(b)}
the first subparagraph was rewritten to explain that the system would be used
for alerts related to “an act of terrorism, a natural disaster, war, other man-made
disasters, or other hazards to public safety” {§526(b)(1)}.
Three other sub-paragraphs were added:
(2) establish or adapt, as
appropriate, common alerting and warning protocols, standards, terminology, and
operating procedures for the integrated public alert and warning system;
(3) include in the integrated
public alert and warning system the capability to adapt the dissemination of
homeland security information and other information, and the content of
communications, on the basis of geographic location, risks, and multiple
communications systems and technologies, as appropriate; and
(7) conduct periodic nationwide
tests of the integrated public alert and warning system.
More interestingly, §526(b)(6)
from the original bill was removed. That was the only place in the bill that
referenced the current National Terrorism Advisory System. It would seem that
the never used NTAS would be phased out if this bill becomes law.
Section 526(d), dealing with the establishment of the Integrated
Public Alert and Warning System Advisory Committee (IPAWSAC), has some changes
made to it as well. The subparagraph dealing with the Federal government
representatives on the IPAWSAC adds the Director of the United States
Geological Survey (or the Director’s designee) {§526(d)(2)(D)}.
Changes are also made to the non-Federal representative in the next
subparagraph:
• Adding a ‘consumer or privacy
advocates’ category;
• Separating out as a separate
category ‘national organizations representing the elderly’; and
• Changing ‘the cellular industry’
to the ‘commercial mobile radio service industry’.
HR 4263
The changes
to the Social Media Working Group Act of 2014 are much less extensive,
which is appropriate considering how recently it was introduced. Section 318
being added to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 is being changed in three
places {§318(g)(1), (2) and (6)} to add
the phrase ‘other emergencies’ in describing when the use of social media is
being considered in the bill.
It also amend the reporting requirement for the Social Media
Group to require the recommended improvements to social media use be
specifically targeted at the use of social media for emergency management purposes [emphasis added].
The Third Bill
The other piece of legislation has now been given the bill
number HR 4289, the Department of Homeland Security Interoperable
Communications Act. I have not yet had a chance to completely review the committee
draft of that bill. It will be done before the Thursday hearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment