Yesterday the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal
Register (79 FR
13970-13975) regarding possible changes to the Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program that would establish criteria to delegate authority to States to
administer HMGP. This rule would implement requirements of the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42
USC 5170c).
This ANPRM seeks to establish requirements for Program
Administration by the States (PAS) in accordance with the requirements set
forth by §51709c(c). FEMA is already establishing a pilot program that would
delegate certain HGMP responsibilities to participating States. To participate
in the pilot a State would have to have:
• An approved State Mitigation Plan;
• Demonstrated an ability to manage
the HGMP; and
• Demonstrated commitment to
mitigation activities.
To develop a full PAS program FEMA is going to have to
determine how the program will operate, how available resources can facilitate
program performance and what FEMA administrative responsibilities can be
delegated to the States. In making these determinations FEMA is soliciting
input in the form of responses to the following questions:
• How to assess the State's
ability to manage the HMGP throughout the program lifecycle?
• What should the relationship
be, if any, between having a FEMA-approved Enhanced Mitigation Plan and
receiving a PAS designation?
• How to assess the State's
demonstration of commitment to mitigation?
• What performance measures
from other State-administered Federal programs could be considered or
incorporated in PAS designation requests?
• What additional elements,
if any, should FEMA consider requiring in Administrative Plans for States with
PAS designation?
• How can States demonstrate impartial
and consistent selection and management of applications when they are also
eligible to be program participants and submit and manage their own
subapplications?
• What should be the level of interaction
between FEMA, the State, local governments, and other program participants
regarding day-to-day program administration?
• Should PAS designation include limits or
factors that would affect the level of State responsibility granted by FEMA?
• Which EHP responsibilities
should be delegated to States under applicable Federal law?
• What criteria should FEMA use to assess performance
of those States that receive PAS designations?
• How could the analysis of program
benefits justifying program costs be an indicator of state performance?
• What would constitute a significant
non-compliance deficiency warranting temporary withdrawal or full
termination of PAS designation?
• What, if any, are the States'
concerns regarding the
use of existing FEMA grant reporting and management electronic systems
(such as NEMIS) when mandated for PAS participation?
• What factors should FEMA consider
and use to encourage
Tribal participation in PAS?
• What are the potential challenges
for States in maintaining PAS designation?
• How would program
participants be impacted when their State administers HMGP under a PAS
designation?
• Would your State or Tribe consider applying for
the PAS option for your next disaster declaration?
• Do you think PAS would be
beneficial in streamlining
the provision of funding under the HMGP?
FEMA is soliciting public feedback on this ANPRM and the
specific questions described above. Comments may be submitted via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (www.Regulations.gov;
Docket # FEMA-2014-0013). Comments should be submitted by May 12th,
2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment