The DOT’s Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety
Administration (PHMSA) published a 60-day ICR revision notice in Monday’s Federal
Register (79 FR
18118-18119, available on-line today) concerning proposals to revise two
forms used by gas transmission and gas distribution pipeline operators to
provide information to the National Registry of Pipeline and LNG Operators
under authority of 49 CFR §191.22
and §195.64.
Those two forms are:
• PHMSA F 1000.1, OPID Assignment
Request; and
• PHMSA F 1000.2, Operator Registry
Notification
OPID Assignment
Request Changes
PHMSA is proposing to make the following changes to the OPID
Assignment Request form:
• Align the gas
distribution and gas transmission commodity choices with those found on the
annual and incident reports;
• Modify the list for
types of gas distribution operators to reflect the ownership structure of the
operator;
• Collect the miles
of pipe and facility descriptions for each state;
• Eliminate liquefied
natural gas (LNG) plans and procedures as a separate safety program type; and
• Collect business
cell phone numbers for contacts in addition to office phone numbers.
Operator Registry
Notification Changes
PHMSA is proposing to make the following changes to the
Operator Registry Notification form:
• Remove and revise
instructions regarding pipeline safety program information submissions at
several locations in the form and instructions;
• Reduce the number
of notification types and the text describing each type to enhance clarity;
• Require Type B
notifications to indicate whether the operator is assuming or ceasing operatorship
of pipeline facilities;
• Require separate
notifications for an acquisition and a divestiture;
• Allow an operator
submitting a divestiture to request the deactivation of their OPID
• Align the gas
distribution and gas transmission commodity choices with those found on the
annual and incident reports;
• Collect data about
miles of pipeline separate from facilities, such as breakout tanks, storage
fields, and compressor stations, in Step 3;
• Require operators
to provide data about pipeline facilities (Step 3) when they submit a change in
entity operating (Type B) notification;
• Collect the miles
of pipe and facility descriptions for each state; and
• Add a “Guidance for
Selecting the Appropriate Notification Type” section to the instructions.
Burden Estimate
This ICR Notice provides a revised estimate of the burden
that these collections will impose on the 2,328 Natural gas, 82 LNG facility
and 335 Hazardous Liquid operators on an annual basis. Table 1 below shows a
comparison of proposed revised ICR with the currently approved ICR for these
forms. The current data comes from
information submitted to the OMB’s
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).
|
Current
OPID
|
Current
Notification
|
Proposed
|
Responses
|
2753
|
11012
|
630
|
Time Burden
|
2753
|
2753
|
630
|
Cost Burden
|
NR
|
NR
|
NR
|
Table 1: Burden Estimates
The currently approved OPID numbers are high because this
was for the initial implementation of the program and all 2753 operators had to
register. Only new operators and certain changes would be reported with this
form now so the current annual collection requirement would be much less than
2753 submissions. PHMSA estimated that it would take one hour to complete the OPID
Assignment Request form.
PHMSA originally estimated that there would be four
notifications per year from each operator using the Operator Registry
Notification form. They estimated that it would take 15 minutes for each of
those notifications.
PHMSA does not routinely report the cost burden in its ICRs.
They do, however, provide a cost estimate to OIRA. They most recently estimated
that hourly cost for this ICR was $64.75 providing a total annual burden cost
for both forms at $356,513.50.
The ICR notice does not make it clear what form the 630
responses would involve. It would seem that the one hour per submission would
mean that it was the OPID Assignment Request. Either that or the proposed
changes to the Operator Registry Notification form would take four times as
long to complete. In either case, PHSMA should explain the basis for the change
in the burden estimate.
Public Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment