As part of the President’s budget request the Administration
publishes proposed language for each of the spending bills that would support
that budget process. This, of course, includes the DHS
spending bill language. Now most of this is pure boiler plate; standard
language that changes little from year to year. The most important policy
provisions are found in ‘General Provisions’ portion of the language (starting
on page 559).
Most of these policy provisions were added to modify various
requirements that were enacted at one time or another by Congress. Rather than
change the underlying law, these provisions make ‘temporary’ changes that, for
the most part, get repeated from year to year. The Administration’s proposed
language makes some significant changes to many of these repeating
modifications including the complete elimination of 30 of the provisions found
in last year’s spending bill.
Eliminations
All of the proposed eliminations from the General Provisions
have placed various restrictions on the spending of the Administration. The
following sections from last year’s DHS spending bill were eliminated in this
proposed language: 512, 513, 515, 518, 521, 523, 527, 529, 532, 533, 534, 535,
537, 539, 542, 543, 544, 546, 547, 553, 554, 557, 558, 559, 560, 565, 566, 568,
570, 571, and 572. Additionally, all of the ‘Rescission’ sections (573 thru
577) were deleted.
Of these three (523, 529, and 533) would have restricted the
Administration’s ability to make the cuts to the Coast Guard spending that I
described in an earlier
post.
CFATS Extension
The proposed DHS spending bill language includes the
obligatory extension of the CFATS §550 authorization. Early in the Obama Administration
there had been an attempt made to make this a two year extension, but this
version only includes (§524) a standard one year extension of the current
authorization.
Moving Forward (NOT)
As I mentioned in my earlier post, the proposed language,
like the budget numbers, will be completely ignored by the House when they
write the DHS spending bill. Almost all of the sections removed by the
Administration will be put back in as a matter of course by the Republican
staff of the Appropriations Committee. The only provision that I am sure will
be included will be the CFATS authorization language.
No comments:
Post a Comment