Yesterday, with only the House in session and preparing to
leave for a week working in their districts (fund raising, campaigning and
constituent support), there were 49 bills introduced. Remembering that most
bills introduced in these situations are proposed to provide talking-points
back home (not serious attempts at legislating), there were six bills that may
be of interest to readers of this blog:
HR 4036
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a defense to prosecution for
fraud and related activity in connection with computers for persons defending
against unauthorized intrusions into their computers, and for other purposes. Rep.
Graves, Tom [R-GA-14]
HR
4038 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to reassert article I
authorities over the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. Rep.
McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10]
HR
4050 To support research, development, and other activities to develop
innovative vehicle technologies, and for other purposes. Rep.
Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-12]
HR
4051 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a bollard
installation grant program, and for other purposes. Rep.
Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13]
HR
4053 To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to require an independent audit
of the cybersecurity practices of certain consumer reporting agencies, and for
other purposes. Rep.
Fortenberry, Jeff [R-NE-1]
HR
4064 To impose restrictions on the sale of binary explosives, and for other
purposes. Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9]
Any changes made to 18
USC 1030 are going to be of potential interest to the cybersecurity
research community. This may be an attempt to carve out an exemption for ‘hacking
back’. Definitions would be very important here.
It is unusual for a Republican (and a Committee Chair) to
introduce a bill reasserting congressional oversight during a Republican
administration. I suspect that this may be related to pending changes in the
organization of National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD), including the
move of ICS-CERT to NCCIC.
HR 4050 sounds like a research grant program for automated
vehicles. It will be interesting to see if it specifically includes
cybersecurity provisions.
Bollards are a common security measure to prevent vehicles
from going where they are not wanted. I suspect that HR 4051 is a response to
recent vehicle attacks on pedestrians, but definitions matter and this could be
used by chemical facilities to fund bollards used to prevent access by vehicle
borne explosives. Again, definitions will be critical.
I am certainly not going to expand this blog to include
coverage of credit reporting agencies (Brian
Krebs has that space covered really well), but the idea of ‘independent
cybersecurity audits’, may prove to be an interesting way of regulating
cybersecurity.
Congress has mixed success with establishing regulatory
schemes for explosives. The ATF has a pretty robust program going,
but attempts to get DHS involved in the control of the sale of ammonium nitrate
are still stalled since the regulations were authorized in 2007. It will be
interesting to see how HR 4064 addresses the situation for binary explosives.
No comments:
Post a Comment