I just received an email from USAJobs.com about two sets of
job openings in DHS Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (the CFATS
people). They have multiple job openings for Chemical Security
Inspectors (and I’ve been calling them Chemical Facility Security
Inspectors to avoid the ‘CSI’ tag) and Supervisory Chemical
Security Inspectors.
Locations
The job listings say that there are openings in multiple
locations for each of these positions.
For the CSI there are “many” openings in the following
cities:
• Memphis, TN
• Fort Snelling, MN
• Madison, WI
• Albuquerque, NM
• Buffalo, NY
• San Francisco, CA
• San Antonio, TX
• Brea, CA
• Pittsburgh, PA
• Louisville, KY
• Fort Snelling, MN
• Madison, WI
• Albuquerque, NM
• Buffalo, NY
• San Francisco, CA
• San Antonio, TX
• Brea, CA
• Pittsburgh, PA
• Louisville, KY
For the SCSI there are “few” openings in the following
cities:
• Grand Prairie, TX
• Houston, TX
• New York, NY
• West Chester, PA
• Tallahassee, FL
• Saint Louis, MO
• Baton Rouge, LA
• Phoenix, AZ
• Knoxville, TN
• Seattle, WA
• Kansas City, MO
• Portland, OR
• San Francisco, CA
• Brea, CA
• Richmond, VA
• Houston, TX
• New York, NY
• West Chester, PA
• Tallahassee, FL
• Saint Louis, MO
• Baton Rouge, LA
• Phoenix, AZ
• Knoxville, TN
• Seattle, WA
• Kansas City, MO
• Portland, OR
• San Francisco, CA
• Brea, CA
• Richmond, VA
Does it seem kind of odd that there are openings in more
cities for SCSI than for CSI? Something is odd there; I’ll try to find out
what. At least it seems that there are more actual openings (many vs few) for
CSI than for SCSI.
Too Many Vacancies
Now there are a ‘few’ vacancies in each city for SCSI. So
does that mean 45 (few – 3, 3*15 cities)? The many vacancies for SCSI could mean 40 (many – 4, 4*10). That would be
85 positions out of about 160 authorized. This is way too many folks missing
from the ranks. I seem to recall hearing 120 inspectors on hand in various hearings.
Have we been losing that many folks because of the problems at ISCD?
CSI Qualifications
The CSI lists slightly different qualifications for people
being hired at the GS-09, GS-11, GS-12, or GS-13 levels. The GS-09 (entry
level) qualifications include one full year of specialized experience
comparable in scope and responsibility to the GS-07 level in the Federal
service (obtained in either the public or private sectors) that involved
knowledge of:
• Homeland security;
• Infrastructure protection;
• Information security;
• Intelligence and law enforcement
information; and
• Information analysis, along with
knowledge of analytical and investigative techniques.
Alternatively an applicant could have a Master’s degree in
one of the following qualifying fields:
• Safety Engineering;
• Industrial Hygiene Inspection;
• Chemical Engineering; and
• Process Safety Engineering.
Interestingly, a degree in chemistry or criminal justice
without additional course work in one of the above fields would not be
qualifying. Combinations of the experience and educational requirements can be
used. Obviously I’m hitting the highlights here, see the job listing for more
details.
SCSI Qualifications
As one might expect the qualifications for the SCSI position
are a bit less complicated. The applicant must have one full year of experience
at the GS-13 level (in the public or private sector) that includes:
• Evaluating subordinate chemical
inspector preparation, performance, and reporting on chemical facility
inspections;
• Reporting on chemical facilities
by utilizing the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS); and
• Supervising the work performance
of other chemical facility inspectors.
Ammonium Nitrate Security Program
There is an odd difference between the descriptions of the
two job positions; even taking into account that one is a supervisory position
and the other is not. The CSI Job Summary section of the job listing notes in
addition to doing CFATS inspections the job would require the CSI to “plan,
organize, schedule and conduct on-site inspections of ammonium nitrate facilities”.
The SCSI Job Summary does not say anything about CFATS but does provide a
similar mention of inspections at ammonium nitrate facilities.
As I mentioned in an earlier blog, DHS does not plan to
issue the Ammonium Nitrate Security Program final rule until December and I
wouldn’t be surprised if it was in 2014 or even 2015 when the final rule was actually
published. But, these job listings both seem to indicate that DHS is ramping up
now for that enforcement effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment