Today DHS (along with the other major Executive Branch
organizations) published their Fall 2012 Regulatory Agenda in the Federal
Register (78 FR
1586-1593). This is supposed to include a brief explanation of those items
on the Department’s
Unified Agenda which is likely to have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Ammonium Nitrate Rule
As I expected the Ammonium Nitrate Security Program does
make the Department’s list of significant rulemakings (RIN
1601–AA52), under the “Long Term Actions” category. The only new
information here is that DHS does not expect to publish a final rule for this
program until December of 2013. That would be just about two years after the
close of the comment period on the NPRM for this rulemaking; if that date is
actually met. There is (as expected) no explanation why this rulemaking was
left off the 2012
Unified Agenda.
Coast Guard Rules
Only one of the four Coast Guard rules that I had identified
as being of specific interest to readers of this blog made it to the DHS list
of significant rulemakings, the Updates to Maritime Security (RIN 1625-AB38)
rulemaking. As I noted in an earlier
blog post , the Coast Guard expects (hold your breath on this timing) to
publish their NPRM on this rule in April of this year. This NPRM was first ‘expected
to be published’ in March of 2010.
TSA Rules
The General Aviation Security rulemaking (RIN 1652-AA53)
is the only TSA rule to make it to the significant rulemakings list that might
be of specific interest to the chemical security or cybersecurity communities.
Actually including that here is a bit of a stretch, but I did need to have
something to show for the TSA. So it was either this or the Aircraft repair
station security rulemaking.
Significance – None
The whole publication of this Unified Agenda and its
associated regulatory plans is really an exercise in bureaucratic back
scratching. Rules are routinely proposed and implemented without making it to
the Agenda. The publication dates from the Agenda are almost never met. And
rules disappear from the Agenda without notice or reason. But, it is the
closest thing to a regulatory plan that the Executive Branch actually has.
No comments:
Post a Comment