Yesterday the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved
an ‘Emergency’
information collection request (ICR) revision submitted by TSA last
October. TSA had been directed by the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (the OMB office that processes and approves ICRs) to submit an
emergency ICR revision request when they
approved the TWIC ICR just weeks after TSA published their TWIC
renewal Exemption notice last June.
The Revised ICR
The emergency ICR was necessary because the short-term change
in policy regarding the renewal of most TWIC pending the establishment of the
final TWIC Reader Rule would reduce the number of people that would be filling
out the TWIC application form for some time into the future. This reduces the
estimated number of annual responses, burden hours and burden cost associated
with the TWIC ICR.
The projected reduction in collections (applications) was
69,744. This translated into a burden hours decrease of 65,200 hours and a cost
savings of $10,389,606.
The Emergency ICR process only allows for a 6-month
approval, leaving this approval to expire on September 30th, 2013.
It also allow for filing of the Emergency ICR without the standard publication
of pre-filing notices in the Federal Register by the agency involved, in this
case TSA.
Approved With Change
It is not too unusual for OIRA to request some minor
revisions when the approve the ICR. Typically, however, the do not publicly
list what that ‘change’ is. In this case they did; the ICR approval notes:
“For the survey portion of this
collection, TSA should consider offering the instrument in Spanish, since this
has been identified as a potential reason for low response rates. In the next
submission, the survey response scales should be modified as discussed. Also,
TSA should consider the sample size/number of respondents, since only a small
fraction of the responses are used to calculate customer service satisfaction.”
They are of course talking about a customer satisfaction survey
that TSA asks TWIC applicants to complete voluntarily and anonymously. While I
have no personal problem with providing survey’s in Spanish (being raised in
California in the 60’s I’m used to bilingual governments) I’m kind of surprised
that OIRA thinks that this would make a significant difference in the response
rate.
TWIC Reader Rule
Impact
With the TWIC Reader NPRM being
issued in the near future we are just a little closer to the final rule,
but it will still be sometime in 2014 before we can possibly expect to see the
final rule published. This means that TSA will have to re-submit the renewal of
the data in the Emergency ICR sometime before September. Then they will have to
include a new ICR submission as part of their publication of the final rule.
Cost Burden
It was interesting to see that TSA included a cost burden in
this ICR. That has been an almost obsolete part of the ICR. TSA did not include
a cost burden, for example, in their Certified Cargo Screening Program ICR that
was recently
approved by OMB. Kudos to TSA for at least attempting to quantify the cost
of compliance in this instance.
No comments:
Post a Comment