Earlier this week the DOT’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA) published
their notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for authorizing the shipment of
liquified natural gas (LNG) by rail. In that NPRM PHMSA specifically solicited
comments on additional controls that could be added to the regulatory requirements
proposed to increase the safety of the shipment of LNG by rail. In this blog
post I will propose a number of those controls.
Application of HHFT Rules
A number of opponents to this NPRM and the PHMSA LNG by rail
special
permit have painted horrific
pictures of the explosive results of accidents involving unit trains of LNG
railcars. While the preamble to this NPRM provides a rebuke
of the potential for explosive accidents, the experience with unforeseen safety
consequences with crude oil unit trains should be fresh in the mind of
regulators and emergency response planners. With that in mind it would seem
prudent to include LNG rail shipments in the High Hazard Flammable Train (HHFT)
requirements.
The administratively simplest way of doing this would be to
revised the definition of High Hazard Flammable Train found in 49
CFR 171.8 by adding the phrase “, including Methane, Cryogenic Liquid, UN1972,”
after the words “Class 3 flammable liquid” where ever that appears in the HHFT definition
or the definition of ‘high hazard flammable unit trains’ in the same section.
Unfortunately, that would be a complicated solution due to
the fact that the §174.310
operational requirements for HHFT pertain to the switch over from DOT 111 to
DOT 117 railcars. Most of those railcar provisions clearly apply only to
flammable liquids and would thus not affect LNG by rail operations. There is
one exception §174.310(a)(4) that would need to be revised to read:
“(4) New tank cars. After
October 1, 2015, tank cars manufactured for Class 3 flammable liquid use in a HHFT must meet:”
PRV Flaring
One of the concerns related to the shipment of LNG is that
methane is a very powerful greenhouse gas and any emissions from the shipment
of LNG could have a disproportionate effect on climate change. Opponents to
this rulemaking will inevitably claim that this was not adequately addressed in
the environmental impact portion of the preamble.
One way to address this issue would be require that the
pressure relief devices required to be employed on these railcars be equipped
with a flaring device. This would ignite the LNG being released and convert the
methane emission to a CO2 emission. There is already such a requirement for DOT
107 specification railcars (49
CFR 179.500-12).
Pressure and Temperature Reporting
Since PHMSA recognizes that the implementation of rail
shipments of LNG will require the construction of a new fleet of DOT 113
railcars, they should take the opportunity to bring safety measurement into the
21st Century. There are two key factors that should be monitored to
ensure the safe shipment of LNG by rail; temperature and pressure. This is
already recognized in the modification of the requirements in §179.319(d)(2).
Technology currently exists that allows for the real-time
measurement, recording and reporting of these two parameters by electronic
devices installed on the railcar. PHMSA should require DOT 113 railcars used to
transport LNG to be equipped with such electronic pressure and temperature devices
and communication between those devices and alarm systems installed in the
controlling locomotive for the trains containing such railcars. This would allow
train crews and emergency response personnel to have operational awareness of impending
releases and would provide for appropriate pre-emergency response to those
impending conditions.
PHMSA should envision requiring all hazmat railcars to have
similar critical measurement capabilities, but that would require extensive and
expensive refit requirements. Here, a new DOT requirement could be included in
the early production of new railcars.
Moving Forward
The measures that I have proposed above would be relatively
cost-effective measures that would increase the safety of the transportation of
liquified natural gas by railcars.
No comments:
Post a Comment