Today the DHS Infrastructure Security Compliance Division
(ISCD) published a fact
sheet about how propane is treated under the Chemical Facility
Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) program. It would appear that this fact sheet
is yet another effort in the CFATS outreach
program.
This is a one-page fact sheet (as opposed to the two-page
sheets that address industry groups) so the amount of information that is
provided is somewhat limited. Fortunately for DHS, the internet provides a way
to pack a great deal of information into that one page via links to various
information sources.
Propane Concentration
There is one link to an often over looked piece of
information related to propane, the Federal Register notice outlining the
special status of propane when looking at the mixture rule. Appendix A clearly
states that the ‘Minimum Concentration’ for propane is 1%, the same as all
other flammable release DHS chemical of interest (COI). But, the Federal
Register Notice from March 21, 2008 clearly states that:
“Since DHS intends the COI propane
to refer to products containing at least 87.5 percent of propane, as well as
other release-flammable COI, it follows that the release-flammable mixtures
rule does not apply to such products. In fact, it would not make sense to apply
the release-flammable mixtures rule to the combination of chemicals that
constitute the COI propane because that would largely negate the intended
effect of the 60,000 pound STQ and the special STQ counting rule for the COI
propane.[6] By contrast, the release- flammable mixtures rule does apply to
products that are a combination of less than 87.5 percent propane and other
release-flammable COI, since such mixtures are not themselves the COI propane.”
This oddity means that if you have 60,000 lbs of a
commercial product that is only 87.4% propane and 13.6% butane, then the standard
1% mixture rule would be in effect and both propane and butane would have to be
reported on a Top Screen at 60,000 lbs. If the product were stored at less than
60,000 lbs but more than 10,000 lbs (the STQ for butane), then only butane
would have to be reported on the Top Screen as the total amount stored. But,
again with ‘standard commercial propane’, only the propane has to be reported
on the Top Screen.
Another Propane Oddity
There is one odd piece of information that is not directly
referenced in the fact sheet, the odd way that propane STQ is calculated. For any
other flammable release DHS chemical of interest, the STQ is calculated by adding
up the total amount of the COI that is stored on the facility or used in processes
at the facility. For propane, in another move to appease the agricultural
community, only
propane that is stored in tanks containing more than 10,000-lbs needs to be
counted towards the 60,000-lb STQ.
CFATS Outreach
One thing that is not clear from the publication of these outreach
fact sheets on the CFATS Knowledge Center is how ISCD expects these fact sheets
to get to the facilities that are not presently covered under the CFATS program
but probably would be if they submitted a Top Screen. This is, after all, the
whole purpose of the outreach program; get the word out to facilities that are
required to submit a Top Screen.
For the industry fact sheets, I would suspect that ISCD is
counting on (and has almost certainly asked) the various professional
organizations that support the covered industries to forward the fact sheet to
their members. While the same technique may be used here I would guess that
ISCD is going to request that covered CFATS facilities that ship propane forward
this fact sheet to their customers that hold inventories over 60,000-lbs in
10,000-lb or greater tanks.
There is an easier way to conduct this outreach effort, ISCD
could always require facilities that ship COI in greater than STQ quantities to
provide ISCD with a list of those customers. Then ISCD could directly contact
the facilities that have not yet submitted Top Screens and require them to do
so under 6 CFR 27.200(b). The authority to request a list of customers is
already provided in 27.200(a):
“… the Secretary may, at any time,
request information from chemical facilities that may reflect potential
consequences of or vulnerabilities to a terrorist attack or incident, including
questions specifically related to the nature of the business and
activities conducted at the facility; information concerning the names, nature,
conditions of storage, quantities, volumes, properties, customers, major
uses, and other pertinent information about specific chemicals or chemicals
meeting a specific criterion….” [emphasis added]
The fact that ISCD has, as of yet, not decided to take this
rather drastic step is probably a matter of consideration of the business needs
of the current CFATS facilities. It is, however, just a matter of time if we
continue to see chemical release incidents at facilities that were, in
retrospect, obviously required to submit Top Screens. Congress can politically
withstand only so many West Fertilizer type incidents with ISCD saying; “Nope,
never heard of them.”
No comments:
Post a Comment