With both the House and Senate in Washington this week
things start to get busy before the primary season starts to make Congress
really political. In addition to marking up the FY 2019 National Defense
Authorization bill and budget hearings we have three hearings that may be of potential
interest to readers of this blog; HR 4 and cybersecurity.
NDAA Markup
The introduced version of HR 5515, the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 was published last week. It has a number
of large holes in it that will be filled this week by subcommittee markups. The
full Armed Services Committee will not finish the markup process until the
House comes back from their spring break the week after next. These two
subcommittee hearings may be of specific interest:
April 26th – Readiness
Subcommittee;
April 26th – Emerging
Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee;
Budget
There are still a number of hearings being held looking at
the President’s proposed budget. This week there is only one that may be of
specific interest here:
April 26th, DHS, House
Homeland Security;
HR 4 Rule
As I mentioned over the weekend, the House Rules Committee
will be holding a hearing
on Tuesday to formulate the rule for the consideration of HR
4, the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, later this week. Two hundred and thirty-one
proposed amendments have been submitted to the Committee for possible
consideration on the floor of the House; the vast majority will not make it.
Fourteen of those amendments deal with unmanned aircraft systems and two deal
with cybersecurity issues. A large number of the rest deal with airport noise
issues, a perennial concern of congresscritters. The bill will probably make it
to the floor on Thursday.
Cybersecurity
On Tuesday the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs Committee will hold a hearing
on “Mitigating America’s Cybersecurity Risk”. The witness list includes:
• Jeanette Manfra, DHS;
• Gregory C. Wilshusen, GAO; and
• Eric Rosenbach; Harvard University
This hearing could go one of two ways; most likely a look at
cybersecurity issues in the Federal government (always a problem), or it could
look at the cybersecurity concerns in critical infrastructure that we have been
hearing about in the mainstream news. In either case it will likely be a
high-level policy type discussion rather than focusing in-depth on any actual
security issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment