Today the DHS Infrastructure Security Compliance Division
(ISCD) published their May
2016 CFATS Fact Sheet. This document provides a monthly update of the
implementation of the site security plan (SSP) program in the Chemical Facility
Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS). ISCD continues to increase the number of
authorized and approved SSPs as well as a significant increase in the number of
compliance inspections.
|
March 2016
|
April 2016
|
May 2016
|
Covered Facilities
|
3,074
|
3,029
|
3,018
|
Authorized SSPs
|
3,324
|
3,336
|
3,356
|
Approved SSPs
|
2,449
|
2,462
|
2,525
|
Compliance Inspections
|
624
|
726
|
854
|
We continue to see the same problems with these numbers that
we have seen every month for quite some time now. We continue to see a decline
in the number of covered facilities without any explanation of why the
facilities are leaving the program. The number of authorized SSPs continues to
increase well beyond the number of facilities that remain in the program. Finally,
we continue to see a report of the number of compliance inspections conducted
without any indication of the rate at which those facilities are found within
compliance with their negotiated SSP requirements.
The number of approved SSPs has now reached 75% of the
number of covered facilities, if there is not the same counting problem that
affects the number of authorized SSPs. It would be nice, however, if additional
details were included, additional numbers that could have been provided would
have been the number of facilities that were approved based upon their
submission of an Expedited Approval Program SSP. With the recent implementation
of the Terrorist Screening Database screening portion of the Personnel Surety
Program a report on the number of approved SSPs that include the TSDB vetting.
While I am glad to see that ISCD is continuing to
voluntarily report these CFATS Updates, it looks like it is really just a PR
ploy since there are so many problems with the data being provided. If ISCD
really wants this to mean anything, they need to consider updating what they
are reporting.
No comments:
Post a Comment