As I mentioned earlier Rep. Walker (R,NC) introduced HR 1022,
the Countering Violent Extremism [CVE] Grants Act. This bill would amend 6
USC 609 by adding a new authorized use for Urban Area Security Grants and State
Homeland Security Grants.
Section 2 of the bill lays out the justification for the
expansion of the use of the two grant programs. It notes recent high profile
attacks conducted by homegrown terrorists in Europe, Canada
and the US .
It concludes that there are too “few initiatives exist to help communities
understand the threat, prevent domestic radicalization, counter the narrative
of extremists, and provide pathways to deradicalization (sic) for individuals
who have become radicalized so they do not resort to violence” {§2(a)(5)}.
To help provide funding for programs that address this issue
the bill would amend the list of allowable uses for the two largest DHS grant
programs by adding to §609(a) a new allowable use for those funds; ‘countering
violent extremism’. Allowable uses under this heading would include {new §609(a)(6)}:
● Training programs;
● The development, implementation,
or expansion of programs to engage communities that may be targeted by violent
extremist radicalization; and
● The development and
implementation of projects to partner with local communities to prevent
radicalization to violence.
While this is a clear expansion of the allowable uses for
these grants, it does not actually expand the amount of money available for
these grant programs. That means it effectively reduces the funds for the other
allowable uses for the grant programs to fund these new uses. This is a classic
example of robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Since ‘countering violent extremism’ is the current
counter-terrorism buzz word and no new funding is being provided this bill
would probably pass in the House if it is brought to a floor vote. As is the
problem with most passable bills it will be getting the attention of the
Homeland Security Committee leadership that will be trick. Walker is a fairly junior member of the Committee,
but he does have an influential co-sponsor, Chairman McCaul (R,TX). I expect
that we will see this bill move fairly quickly thru the Committee and to the
floor of the House.
No comments:
Post a Comment