As I noted last week Rep. Waxman (D,CA) and Sen. Markey
(D,MA) both introduced bills relating to the security of the electric grid.
While the Senate bill has not yet been published by the GPO, I think that we
can safely assume that HR 4298 and S 2158 are both entitled the Grid
Reliability and Infrastructure Defense (GRID) Act and are, in fact, companion
bills. Since only HR 4298 is currently available, all references to the bill
will be based upon this version, but I don’t expect that there will be any
differences in the two bills.
The bill amends Part II of the Federal Power Act (16
USC 824 et seq), adding Section 215A.
Definitions
Paragraph (a) of the bill adds a number of definitions to
the FPA. They include:
• Defense critical electric
infrastructure
• Defense critical electric
infrastructure vulnerability
• Electromagnetic pulse
• Geomagnetic storm
• Grid security threat
• Grid security vulnerability
• Large transformer
• Protected information
The most critical of these definitions is the ‘defense
critical electrical infrastructure’. It is defined as any infrastructure used
for the generation, transmission, or distribution of electric energy that:
• Is not part of the bulk-power
system; and
• Serves a facility designated by
the President; but
• Is not owned or operated by the
owner or operator of the designated facility.
Considering the wide spread discussion the attack on a
California substation last year it is important to note that both the ‘grid
security threat’ and ‘grid security vulnerability’ definitions specifically
include direct physical attacks.
Emergency Response
Measures
Paragraph (b) provides the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) authority to issue emergency orders “to protect the reliability
of the bulk-power system or of defense critical electric infrastructure” {§215A(b)(1)}.
Emergency orders do not require advance notice, public hearings or reports as
long as the President provides “(either directly or through the Secretary) a
written directive or determination identifying an imminent grid security threat”.
When the President issues such a directive or determination,
he is required to promptly notify Congress. That notification will include “the
contents of, and justification for, such directive or determination” {§215A(b)(2)}.
As the situation permits FERC is required to consult with {§215A(b)(3)
and (4)}:
• The appropriate governmental
authorities in Canada and Mexico;
• The Secretary of Energy;
• Other appropriate Federal
agencies;
• The Electric Reliability
Organization;
• The affected regional entity; and
• The affected owner, user, or
operator of the bulk-power system or of defense critical infrastructure within
the United States.
FERC is required to issue an order discontinuing the
emergency order within 30 days of the first of the following occurrences {§215A(b)(5)}:
• The President notifies FERC that
the threat no longer exists;
• FERC determines that the
emergency measures are no longer needed; or
• One year after the order was
issued.
FERC may establish mechanisms for
owners and operators to recover substantial costs related to compliance with
the emergency order. The typical notice and opportunity for comment process will
be used in establishing any such mechanism.
Measures to Address
Grid Security Vulnerabilities
Section 215A(c) provides authority for FERC, when they
determine that an existing grid security vulnerability is not adequately
addressed through existing reliability standards, to “promulgate a rule or
issue an order requiring implementation, by any owner, operator, or user of the
bulk-power system in the United States, of measures to protect the bulkpower
system against such vulnerability” {§215A(c)(1)}. The standard rulemaking
process will be followed.
FERC is specifically required to issue a rule or order
requiring bulk-power system owners, users, or operators to take “such measures
as are necessary to protect the bulk-power system against the vulnerabilities
identified in the June 21, 2007, communication to certain ‘Electricity Sector
Owners and Operators’ from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation,
acting in its capacity as the Electricity Sector Information and Analysis
Center” {§215A(c)(2)}.
The bill would require that FERC approve reliability
standards developed as a result of rules or orders that have been issued under
provisions of this bill unless they determine that “such reliability standard
does not adequately protect against such vulnerability or otherwise does not
satisfy the requirements of section 215 [§824o]”
{§215A(c)(3)}. Once such reliability standards are approved, FERC will rescind
the rule or order that had been issued to address the vulnerability.
The bill would specifically require FERC to address the
issue of large transformer availability. Within a year of the bill being
adopted FERC would be required to go through the typical rulemaking process to
issue an order requiring the Electric Reliability Organization (ERO), within an
additional year, adopt reliability standards on the availability of large
transformers. That standard would require owner/operators of large transformers
to ensure “adequate availability of large transformers to promptly restore the
reliable operation of the bulk-power system in the event that any such transformer
is destroyed or disabled as a result of a reasonably foreseeable physical or
other attack or geomagnetic storm event” {§215A(c)(4)}.
Critical Defense
Facilities
Section 215A(d) requires the President to designate up to 100
Critical Defense Facilities within 180 days of the enactment of this
legislation. Such facilities would be located in the United States and are
determined to be {§215A(d)(1)}:
• Critical to the defense of the
United States; and
• Vulnerable to a disruption of the
supply of electric energy provided to such facility by an external provider.
Any time that FERC becomes aware of an unresolved defense
critical electric infrastructure vulnerability they will, using typical
rulemaking procedures, will promulgate a rule or issue an order requiring the
owner/operator of the affected critical defense infrastructure to implement “measures
to protect the defense critical electric infrastructure against such
vulnerability” {§215A(d)(2)}.
Protection of
Information
Section 215A(e) establishes a new class of protected
information that is exempt from Freedom of Information Act disclosure or “State,
local, or tribal law requiring disclosure of information or records” {§215A(e)(1)(B)}.
FERC is required to establish regulations and issue orders as necessary to
designate protected information and prohibit unauthorized disclosure of such
information while facilitating “the appropriate sharing of protected
information with, between, and by Federal, State, local, and tribal authorities,
the Electric Reliability Organization, regional entities, and owners,
operators, and users of the bulk-power system in the United States and of
defense critical electric infrastructure” {§215A(e)(2)(B)}.
FERC is directed to minimize the amount of information
designated protected information and require the segregation of protected and
unprotected information to “facilitate disclosure of information that is not
designated as protected information” {§215A(e)(4)}.
Provision of Assistance
to Industry in Meeting Grid Security Protection Needs
Section 215A(g) requires the Secretary, in conjunction with
other Federal agencies, to develop “technical expertise in the protection of
systems for the generation, transmission, and distribution of electric energy
against geomagnetic storms or malicious acts using electronic communications or
electromagnetic pulse” {215A(g)(1)}.
That technical expertise will be shared with owners and
operators of systems used for the generation, transmission or distribution of
electric energy in the United States as well as with State commissions.
Priority will be given to systems serving critical defense facilities and other
critical infrastructure facilities identified by FERC.
Certain Federal
Entities
Section 215A(h) exempts the Tennessee Valley Authority and
the Bonneville Power Administration from orders and regulations under the
Emergency Response Measures, §215A(b), and Measures to Address Grid Security
Vulnerabilities, §215A(c), requirements
of this legislation for a period of 11 years. The one exception to this
exemption is measures addressing a malicious act using electronic communication”.
No comments:
Post a Comment