As I mentioned
earlier Sen. Markey (D,MA) introduced S
1767, the Pipeline Modernization and Consumer Protection Act. This bill
would encourage gas pipeline companies to accelerate the replacement of aging
or leaking gas pipelines.
Provisions of the
Bill
Section 2(a) of the bill identifies a number of
Congressional Findings about the current state of repair of gas pipelines in
the United States. Among those findings is the observation that there is no
federal regulation of minor gas leaks that might indicate the poor state of
repair of an aging piping infrastructure and that ignoring these minor leaks is
actually encouraged by the rate structure of the distributed gas.
Section 2(b) of the bill adds §60112A to 49
USC Chapter 601. Paragraph (a) of that new section defines ‘gas pipeline
facility’ as either a distribution facility or a gas utility. Paragraph (b)
provides that each such facility will ‘accelerate’ the repair or replacement of
pipeline equipment that is leaking or presents a high-risk of leaking.
Paragraph (c) describes potential policy options for State agencies or
unregulated facilities to ‘consider’. Those options include:
• Developing timelines to
repair/replace ‘all leaking equipment’ including non-hazardous leaks {§60112A(c)(1)(A)};
• Adopting a cost recovery plan for
such repairs/replacements that takes into account economic, safety and
environmental benefits of the resulting leak reduction{§60112A(c)(1)(B)};
• Adopting a standard definition
and methodology for calculating and reporting unaccounted-for gas {§60112A(c)(1)(C)};
• Adopting limits on cost recovery
for lost and unaccounted-for gas {§60112A(c)(1)(D)}; and
• Require the use of best available
technology to detect gas leaks {§60112A(c)(1)(E)}.
Section 2(c) of the bill addresses the establishment of “non-binding
guidelines identifying best practices under” the new §60112A established by
this bill. The guidelines will be established by PHMSA in consultation with “State
regulatory authorities, the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and other
appropriate Federal agencies”.
Section 3 of the bill requires PHMSA to “establish and
publish forms that adopt a standard definition and methodology for calculating
and reporting unaccounted-for gas, including, when possible, information on the
causes of unaccounted-for gas and the quantities associated with each cause,
for use by applicable Federal agencies to standardize the data collected on unaccounted-for
gas”.
Commentary
While this bill clearly identifies a possible reason for gas
pipeline failures (minor leaks due to age or inadequate pipeline construction)
it does not actually provide any authority for PHMSA to do something about the
problem. The bill provides ideas for the 27 State agencies that regulate gas
pipelines, but does not actually require them, or give them incentives, to take
the suggested actions. And it does nothing to address the problem in the other
23 States that lack such regulatory agencies.
Since this bill does not actually require anyone to do
anything, it is unlikely that there will be any significant opposition from the
regulated community. As such this bill, if it makes it through the Senate
Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, would probably be approved by the
Senate in one of the end-of-day unanimous consent approvals. Similar approval
in the House would probably take place in an under-suspension-of-the-rules
vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment