Yesterday the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
announced their approval of the latest EPA notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
for the 2013 critical use exemptions for methyl bromide. Since 2005 the EPA has
been trying to phase out the use of methyl bromide in agricultural applications
since it is one of the chemicals covered under the Montreal Protocol to protect
stratospheric ozone. Each year the EPA must provide a rule allowing the use of
methyl bromide in those critical agricultural applications where there are not
effective alternatives to that chemical.
Once again this rule will be published well after the first
of the year requiring the EPA to issue an extra legal letter to manufacturers
and importers informing them of how much methyl bromide they will be allowed to
make or import to support agricultural uses next year while they are waiting on
the regulatory process to wind its bureaucratic way through Washington.
While the EPA was a month
later submitting their NPRM to OMB than they were last year, the OMB took
almost two months longer than
last year in approving the NPRM. As appears to be usual with this recurring
rule, the OMB approval was issued ‘consistent with change’, meaning that some
minor changes will have to be made to the NPRM before it is published in the
Federal Register. I expect to see that early next week.
The EPA does have some excuse for their later than normal
submission of the NPRM. In June they approved a new
use for the chemical as a fumigant to imported feed-grade cotton seeds.
This probably had some impact on the amount of methyl bromide that would be
allowed to be used next year.
At this point long time readers will be expecting to see my
standard rant about the removal of methyl bromide (a toxic inhalation hazard
chemical) from the DHS chemical of concern list for the CFATS program. I’ll
forgo the whole rant until the actual NPRM is published.
No comments:
Post a Comment