On Tuesday the DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
Agency (CISA) published a notice in the Federal Register (84
FR 32768-32777) outlining the implementation process for the
expansion of the Personnel Surety Program (PSP) to Tier III and IV
facilities. Yesterday they updated the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards
(CFATS) program landing
page with a note about that expansion that pointed at the revised PSP web site.
Overview
Back in 2016 the DHS Infrastructure Security Compliance Division
(ISCD, now part of CISA) implemented
the portion of the PSP that provided for identifying CFATS employees and
contractors or visitors with unaccompanied access to critical areas in covered facilities
that may have ties to terrorist. The initial implementation was limited to Tier
I and II facilities. In late 2017, ISCD started
the process to expand the PSP process to Tier III and IV facilities.
The PSP web site has an interesting graphic that
conceptually explains the PSP implementation process:
First, once notified by ISCD that the facility will begin
the implementation process (and that notice will start the 60-day clock implementation
clock), the facility will update their site security plan to include
information about how they will implement the process at their facility. This weeks’
notice provides a look at what types of
information ISCD will be looking for in that SSP modification. When ISCD
approves that amended SSP the clock will again start on the facility’s actual
implementation of that facility specific process.
ISCD will phase this implementation in over the next two
years or so. They will provide each Tier III and IV facility with a notice of
when they will officially begin the implementation process and the date of that
notice begins the 60-day period in which the facility must submit a revised SSP.
Facilities can begin work on that SSP revision now, or they can wait until they
receive the notice. Facilities can even submit the amended SSP before they
receive their notice.
Tier III and IV facilities that have not yet had their SSP approved
(or perhaps even authorized) should expect that their SSP will have to include
PSP implementation before ISCD give approval to the plan.
PSP Options
The CFATS PSP provides four different options that
facilities may use to screen individuals for possible terrorist ties; actually
five since ISCD included an obligatory possibility for facilities to propose
some sort of alternative that would accomplish the same thing. Facilities may
use any option or combination of options that they wish.
The notice describes each of
these four options (imaginatively entitled: Option 1, Option 2, Option 3 and Option 4) in some
detail. In my 2016 blog post I described them this way:
Option 1 – Facility submits data
and ISCD has TSA conduct screening;
Option 2 – Facility submits data on
personnel with previous screening and ISCD has TSA confirm that screening is
current;
Option 3 – Facility uses TWIC
Reader to verify identity and screening status of Transportation Workers
Identification Credential (TWIC) holder; and
Option 4 – Facility visually
inspects TSDB based identity document to verify that person had been screened
against TSDB.
Commentary
I will keep this brief today since I already said most of
what I want to say back in 2016. In fact, I did an entire blog
post about what problems I expected facilities to face in implementing the
PSP. I have not seen anything since then that would significantly change those
observations.
Most facilities are going to find that they need a blended
approach using two or more of the options that ISCD has provided. I think that
every facility should probably expect to use all four options at one point or
another. If the initial SSP revision addresses all four options, then the
facility will have the maximum amount of flexibility in the PSP implementation.
It would certainly save time down the road.
Remember, facilities can (should) begin their SSP revision
process before they receive their notice from ISCD. I would not recommend
submitting the revised SSP before that notice is received, because the official
notice is also going to trigger specific Chemical Security Inspector support for
the revision process.
No comments:
Post a Comment