Yesterday with both the House and Senate in Session (and the
election recess quickly approaching) there were 61 bills introduced. Of those,
three may receive additional attention in this blog:
HR 6913
To direct the Secretary of Commerce to establish a working group to recommend
to Congress a definition of blockchain technology, and for other purposes. Rep.
Guthrie, Brett [R-KY-2]
H
Res 1082 Providing for the concurrence by the House in the Senate amendment
to H.R. 302, with an amendment. Rep.
Williams, Roger [R-TX-25]
S
3513 A bill to establish a deadline for the establishment of a process to
allow applicants to petition the Administrator of the Federal Aviation
Administration to prohibit or restrict the operation of an unmanned aircraft in
close proximity to a fixed site facility. Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]
With the exception of H Res 1082 (which passed in the House
yesterday by a vote of
398 to 23) it is unlikely that these bills will see any action between now
and the end of the session in December.
The resolution is the vehicle for changing HR 302 into the
FAA Reauthorization Act (plus boondoggles) that I
described on Tuesday. I presume that the actual text of the amendment is
what I linked to in that post, but we will have to wait and see what is
actually included in the official text to be sure.
I am assuming that the ‘blockchain’ definition being
requested in HR 6913 will be related to cybersecurity, but it is really to
early to be sure. I am not sure for what use Guthrie is intending the
definition, but this will be interesting to watch, if and when this is
addressed.
S 3513 becomes potentially important with yesterday’s
inclusion of the ‘Preventing Emerging Threats Act of 2018’ language in the
revised HR 302. Declaring UAS ‘no fly zones’ around critical infrastructure
will be ineffective unless Congress gets around to extending authorization to intercept
violating UAS, but this could be an important first step; again if and when this
is passed.
No comments:
Post a Comment