Yesterday the DHS National Protection and Programs
Directorate (NPPD) published a 60-day information collection request (ICR)
notice in the Federal Register (82 FR
18466-18468) for revisions being made to support the Chemical-Terrorism
Vulnerability Information (CVI) program within the Chemical Facility
Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS). The proposed changes reduce the number of
information collections and the DHS burden estimate for that program.
Changes
Based upon the experience of the last three years, the
Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) of the NPPD is removing five
information collection instruments from this ICR. They are:
• “Determination of CVI”;
• “Determination of a “Need to
Know” by a Public Official”;
• “Disclosure of CVI Information;
• “Notification of Emergency or
Exigent Circumstances”; and
• “Tracking Log for CVI Received”
This leaves just one ICR instrument covered by this
collection, the information collected by the CVI Training web site and the subsequent
CVI user application. ISCD reports that they
expect a reduction in the number of respondents for this remaining instrument
to decrease from 30,000 to 20,000.
Commentary
Once again it is nice to see a detailed accounting of the
changes being proposed by a federal agency in the ICR process. Such details
provide the data necessary to make informed comments for ultimate consideration
by the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
I also commend DHS for this review of the collection
instruments covered by the ICR and their intent to remove little used or
unnecessary instruments. Having said that, I have concerns about the removal three
of the identified instruments;
• “Disclosure of CVI Information;
• “Notification of Emergency or
Exigent Circumstances”; and
• “Tracking Log for CVI Received”
All three of these instruments are still required by the DHS
CVI Procedural Manual; the first with mandatory language (“must promptly
report”) and the other two with permissive language (“should be kept and
submitted” and “DHS encourages"). In fact, the first is required by the
CFATS regulations {6
CFR 27.400(d)(7)}.
The notice would appear to attempt to address these three
instruments by stating
that:
“The Department expects that in
many instances when the Department may need or want to collect information
regarding emergency and/or unauthorized disclosure of CVI, the collection would
not be covered by the Paperwork Reduction Act because the information would be
collected during the conduct of an investigation involving specific individuals
or entities. See 44 U.S.C. 3518(c)”
That would certainly be true of the subsequent investigation
of the reports in the first two instances, but not the initial reports themselves.
I would like to suggest that DHS continues to retain these
three instruments in this ICR with an appropriate low number of respondents and
the current estimate of burden hours and cost rates.
Public Comments
DHS is soliciting public comments about this ICR. Comments
may be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (www.Regulations.gov; DHS-2017-0015).
Comments should be submitted by June 19th, 2017.
A copy of this blog post is being submitted as a comment to
this ICR notice.
No comments:
Post a Comment