The House Rules Committee will
meet tomorrow to look at what amendments may be considered during the floor
debate on a surface transportation authorization bill. The Committee web site lists 182
proposed amendments to HR 3763 and another 88 amendments to the ‘non-transportation
provisions’ of HR 22 that have been submitted. The Committee will winnow that
down to some manageable number (my guess is in the neighborhood of 20) that
will actually be allowed to be offered in the floor debate.
Of those 270 amendments, only nine [corrected from 'seven' 11-05-15 7:19 pm CST] may be of specific
interest to readers of this blog. Those amendments will fall in the general
categories of HAZMAT, Train Safety, Pipeline Safety, and Cybersecurity.
HAZMAT Amendments
Amendment
#13 would require the Secretary to consult with States about States
specific safety hazards and concerns that should be taken into account in
developing railroad comprehensive oil spill response plans.
Amendment
#44 would require the Secretary to initiate a study on the levels and structure
of insurance for a railroad carrier transporting hazardous materials. The study
would be required to address the potential applicability of the liability
regimes described in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Public Health
Service Act. Requires the obligatory report to Congress.
Train Safety
Amendments
Amendment
#64 would require the Secretary to submit a report to Congress on using a
system that measures Vertical Track Deflection (VTD) from a moving railcar to identify
poor track support from fouled ballast, deteriorated cross ties, or other
conditions.
Amendment
#80 would authorize the use of $270 Million for grants to railroads for PTC
implementation.
Amendment
#107 would require the Secretary to revise the standard for DOT 117R cars
to include protection for top fittings and pressure relief vavles.
Pipeline Safety
Amendments
Amendment
#159 provides for State or tribal governments to request additional DOT
safety reviews of pipeline transportation infrastructure projects.
Cybersecurity
Amendments
Amendment
#38 would establish an Automated and Connected Vehicle Research Initiative
to lay the foundation for the broad scale adoption of automated vehicle
technology. There is one very brief mention of cybersecurity in the lengthy
amendment. Section XX(d)(2)(H) would require that “cyber-physical security”
would be one of the items considered in deployment guidance developed by the
Initiative.
Amendment
#140 would require the Secretary to report to Congress on the use of IOT to
improve transportation services in rural, suburban, and urban areas, including
systems that meet the needs of an aging population. It includes a requirement
to report on current best practices to protect privacy and security.
Amendment
#169 would require the Secretary to report to congress on the end-to-end
cybersecurity of motor vehicles that integrate computer technology that is
sourced by a supply chain not directly controlled by the manufacturer. It
includes a specific requirement to consider the use of NIST standards for securing
computer systems and with respect to failsafe systems.
Moving Forward
Bases upon past practices it is quite likely that none of
these seven amendments will make their way into this bill (probably considered
under the number HR 22). None of these amendments would face substantial
opposition on the floor.
Rule Published this evening calls for 29 Amendments to be considered; 7 Republican, 9 Democrat, 13 Bipartisan. Which ones will be determined tomorrow. Added 11-02-15 23:05 CST.
Rule Published this evening calls for 29 Amendments to be considered; 7 Republican, 9 Democrat, 13 Bipartisan. Which ones will be determined tomorrow. Added 11-02-15 23:05 CST.
No comments:
Post a Comment