Today the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
published a 30-day information collection request (ICR) notice in the Federal
Register (77 FR
71431) to support their new Highway Baseline Assessment for Security
Enhancement (BASE) Program. This program will replace the TSA’s Highway Corporate
Security Reviews.
According to today’s ICR notice the “TSA's Highway BASE
program seeks to establish the current state of security gaps and implemented
countermeasures throughout the highway mode of transportation by posing
questions to major transportation asset owners and operators”. The TSA expects
to conduct about 750 on-site assessments under this ICR on an annual basis with
each assessment lasting about 3 hours.
The notice states that there were four comments filed on the
earlier 60-day ICR notice (77 FR 3162),
but since those comments were not solicited or filed via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (www.Regulations.gov)
there is no readily available source for reviewing those comments. This notice
only informs us that:
“Two comments were unrelated to the
ICR. The remaining two comments were requests for program information.”
According to the earlier 60-day notice the program will
exclude “hazardous materials shippers and carriers as per agreement with U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT)” (77 FR 31633). While the remaining trucking
industry will be covered by the TSA security effort the most critical component
from the point of view of the potential risk of chemical attacks on large
segments of the population via terrorist attacks on HazMat shipments (anhydrous
ammonia, or chlorine for example). While
I understand that DOT (federal and State) has many more inspectors, but TSA has
primary responsibility (and supposedly the expertise) for transportation
security, not DOT.
OMB needs to resolve this conflict of regulatory responsibility
between DOT(PHMSA) and DHS(TSA). This ICR would be a good vehicle to initiate
efforts to make DHS actually responsible for the security of HazMat
transportation.
2 comments:
I disagree with the comment that "TSA" is the expert in transportation security. I was with the FMCSA on 9/11/2001 before TSA was even formed. The last quarter of 2001 I performed 237 security contacts with HM shippers and carriers in Illinois to ask they tighten up on security measures. By the middle of 2002 the FMCSA was working with Battelle National Security to develop a Security Review Program. The FMCSA developed the Security Contact Review (SCR) in 2002 in TSA's infancy. As late as 2010 TSA had not fully developed its CFATS program.
TSA should partner with the DOT to better train their staff.
IMHO the effort is to create a larger government. Big Brother is getting closer every day.
I agree, the role of the TSA was suppose to be for transportation and not DOT related business. I am however skeptical about OMB actually resolving the conflict.
Post a Comment