Earlier this week the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) announced
the approval of an information
collection request (ICR) submitted by DHS National Protection and Programs Directorate
(NPPD) that would allow NPPD to collect information during a survey of
participants of the Protected
Critical Infrastructure Information (PCII) program. The ICR was approved
without change.
The ICR
The original Federal Register notice for this ICR (76 FR
17935-17936) notes that:
The PCII Program helps government analysts,
emergency responders, and other homeland security professionals access data
about facilities and systems on which the Nation depends. The PCII Program is
responsible for ensuring compliance with the regulation’s uniform procedures
for the handling, use, dissemination, and safeguarding of PCII. In this
capacity, the PCII Program oversees a community of stakeholders, including
submitters of CII, authorized users of PCII and accredited Federal, State and
local entities with homeland security duties.
The purpose of the survey covered by this ICR is to “gather
information to improve relationships with stakeholders and maximize the value
of the PCII Program” according to the abstract provided in the ICR notice. NPPD
expects to have 100 responses to this survey and expects that it will take
about 13 hours for a respondent to collect the data and respond. As is typical
for NPPD submitted ICRs, they don’t expect this effort to cost the respondents
any money; apparently they have never heard of the adage that time is money.
Interestingly, this ICR was originally
submitted in February and then was withdrawn by NPPD in July; there is no
word why the ICR was withdrawn at that time. It was resubmitted in September
with no new Federal Register notices (ICR submissions require a 60-day notice
and a 30-day notice before being sent to OMB), so one would like to assume that
there were no significant changes made in the submission documentation.
The Questionnaire
There is a link to the approved PCII
Stakeholder Survey provided in the ICR document; it is actually a Word®
document version of the on-line survey. The version
of the survey in the original submission is actually a series of web shots of
the actual planned on-line survey. The only real differences between the two
are differing sets of questions 11 thru 14. There is nothing startling in the
differences in those questions other than the approved version appears to be
asking for slightly less detail. Perhaps this was done to increase the
anonymity of the responses.
While the new question 11 does include ‘Submitter’ as one of
the responses to describe the person completing the survey, the responses to
question 12 does make it clear that this survey is being targeted at government
users of the PCII program, not the public portion that is actually providing
the information. That may be why there is no cost associated with the 13 hours
per response noted in the ICR.
Implications
I think that it is fair to say that the proper sharing of
PCII is an important perquisite to ensuring that intelligence and security
analysts have access to the necessary information necessary for doing their
jobs. As such it is important for the PCII program managers to understand those
things that are making that proper sharing of information more difficult.
The Wiki Leaks fiasco has also shown us what happens when it
is too easy to share critical information. It would have been nice to see at
least one question in the survey that would address the issues of inadequate
information sharing controls.
No comments:
Post a Comment