Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) announced
that it had approved an emergency information collection request (ICR) from the
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to collect information on Critical
Infrastructure Workers Denied Movement Reporting. An on-line form would be used
by CISA designated Essential Critical Infrastructure Workers (ECIW) to report
incidences where local law enforcement agencies denied their movement to or
from designated critical infrastructure facilities.
According to the Supporting Document submitted to OIRA by
CISA (pg 1, section 1):
“As part of our routine monitoring
or our programs, we have heard anecdotal evidence that even though our
non-mandatory guidance [See Version
3.0 of the Essential Critical Infrastructure Workers list] has been
adopted, local Law Enforcement are not fully following this guidance and have
restricted entities that are excepted by local rules. CISA has a duty to
evaluate the risk of this behavior. The proposed collection will not attempt to
rigorously validate or measure the prevalence of these incidents, but
represents an important first step in better understanding the issue.”
CISA will post a copy of the proposed
form [.PDF download link] on its web site for ECIW to use in reporting these
incidents.
OIRA approved the emergency collection for six months. OIRA
noted in their ‘Terms of Clearance’ that:
“The agency will not use the anecdotal information collected
for statistical purposes to form the basis of a justification for further
guidance or rulemaking efforts.”
The emergency ICR approval process allowed CISA to submit
the ICR to ORIRA without going through the normal 30-day and 60-day ICR
publication process.
Commentary
This is an odd little ICR. I am not sure how much of an
issue this ‘problem’ is (and apparently neither does CISA), but I suspect that
CISA will not have an easy time reaching their target audience to collect this
data. Since my day job is in one of the ECIW positions, I will be watching for messaging
about this collection effort.
One added thing about this ICR is that the submission must
have been something of a rush effort at CISA. Whom ever prepared the submission
paperwork did a simple (and quick) cut and paste effort. The submitted Supporting
Statement (.PDF download link) contains a number of references [See page 6,
section 16 for instance] to ‘NPPD’, the agency which pre-dated the formation of
CISA.
No comments:
Post a Comment