Yesterday the House passed HR
4634, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019. The
vote was a strongly bipartisan vote of 385 to 22. The bill is likely to be taken up in the
Senate under their unanimous consent process; this would mean no debate and no actual
vote.
The version considered by the House has yet to be published
(nor has the Committee report on the amended version of the bill), but the
Committee web site provides a copy of the amended
language. The revised bill does make an attempt to address the cyber
concerns that I expressed (okay, almost certainly not as a result of my blog
post) in my introduction blog. Instead of including provisions specifically
addressing potential cyberattack effects, it requires a study of the potential
effects of the problem and a report to Congress on how future amendments of the
bill should address those potential effects.
Rep McHenry (R,NC), the Ranking Member of the House
Financial Services Committee, commented on the potential need for these
provisions during yesterday’s
debate:
“What I am concerned about is this:
I am concerned a large-scale cyberattack could pose these same hidden risks to
insurers and to the market, since we don’t fully understand the effects of a
large-scale cyberattack and how that would play out today.
“Moreover, the digital capabilities
of our adversaries only continue to grow. Just look at Russia. In 2015, a Russian
cyberattack shut down Ukraine’s power grid for as long as 6 hours. If it is not
Russia, it is China, Iran, North Korea. State sponsors of terror want to cause
as much damage to the United States as they can. And that is not just the
government’s fear or utilities, it is every part of our economy.
“It is our duty to make sure that
this program is adaptable to respond to any event that could become a reality.”
No comments:
Post a Comment