Last month Rep. Rush (D,IL) introduced HR 1315,
the Blue Collar to Green Collar Jobs Development Act of 2019. The bill would amend
42
USC 7141 to require DOE to “establish and carry out a comprehensive, nationwide
program to improve education and training for jobs in energy-related industries”
{§201(a)}. The bill
would authorize $100 million each year through 2024 for the revised program.
Moving Forward
Rush is the Chair of the Energy Subcommittee of the House
Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the two committees to which this bill was
assigned for consideration. This bill is almost certain to be considered in
Subcommittee and will probably be considered by the full committee. The
authorization portion of the bill is the only thing that might provide for any
opposition to the bill; potentially stopping the bill from making it to the floor
of the House for consideration.
Commentary
The attentive reader will note that I have not gone into any
detail about the provisions of the bill. This is because the bill contains no
provisions addressing cybersecurity jobs, even indirectly. Normally, I would
have just deleted this bill from the list of bills that I was watching, but the
lack of cybersecurity coverage is so egregious given the nature of the bill
that I just had to call it out.
Any bill that intends to sets out to “to increase the number
of skilled workers trained to work in such energy-related industries”{§201(a)}, especially
programs directed at “religious and ethnic minorities, women, veterans,
individuals with disabilities, unemployed energy workers, and socioeconomically
disadvantaged individuals” {§201(a)(1)}
needs to include cybersecurity training and education as one of its areas of
focus.
The lack of cybersecurity coverage in the bill could be addressed
by making the following relatively minor changes to the bill:
Page 4, line 9; insert “cybersecurity,”
after “manufacturing,”;
Page 6, line 9; insert “cybersecurity,”
after “manufacturing,”;
Page 8, line 8; insert “cybersecurity,”
after “manufacturing,”;
Page 9, line 10; insert “cybersecurity,”
after “turing,”;
Page 10, line 3; insert “cybersecurity,”
after “turing,”;
Page 10, line 10; insert “cybersecurity,”
after “manufacturing,”;
Page 12, after line 24; insert
“(M) Cybersecurity industry,
including work as cybersecurity researchers, equipment installers, and security
operation center operators.”
Page 13, line 24; insert “cybersecurity
sector,” after “energy efficiency sector,”;
Page 19, after line 24; insert
“(11) Cybersecurity industry – The term “cybersecurity industry” means businesses or self-employed individuals providing services in cyber vulnerability research; cybersecurity consultation; cybersecurity equipment design, manufacture, installation or operation; or the establishment or operation of cybersecurity operation centers.”
“(11) Cybersecurity industry – The term “cybersecurity industry” means businesses or self-employed individuals providing services in cyber vulnerability research; cybersecurity consultation; cybersecurity equipment design, manufacture, installation or operation; or the establishment or operation of cybersecurity operation centers.”
I suspect that the reason may have been that Rush was
concerned that adding cybersecurity jobs to the listing of covered programs
that the bill would have also been referred to the House Homeland Security
Committee for consideration. That could have provided an additional roadblock
for the bill on its way to the floor of the House.
One interesting part of this bill is its broad definition of
‘energy related industries’. The industries embraced by this definition include
{§201(i)(2)}:
• Energy efficiency industry;
• Renewable energy industry;
• Community energy resiliency
industry;
• Fuel cell and hydrogen energy
industry;
• Manufacturing industry;
• Chemical manufacturing industry;
• Utility industry;
• Alternate fuels industry;
• Pipeline industry;
• Nuclear industry;
• Oil and gas industry; and
• Coal industry;
The inclusion of the ‘chemical manufacturing industry’ is
rather odd in this context, especially since it is lot limited to production of
energy related chemicals. I would assume that this is an attempt by Rush to
include support for specific constituencies within his district. The
description of the jobs addressed in this sector is both detailed and broad. It
includes {§201(i)(2)(F)}:
• Work in construction (such as
welders, pipefitters, and tool and die makers);
• Instrument and electrical
technicians;
• Machinists;
• Chemical process operators;
• Engineers;
• Quality and safety professionals;
and
• Reliability engineers.
If this bill were to pass, the chemical industry might want to carefully watch the development of this DOE program.
No comments:
Post a Comment