Today the DHS Infrastructure Security Compliance Division
(ISCD) updated the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Knowledge Center. The ‘Documentation’
section of the page now includes links to four new CFATS fact sheets for
industries that are not normally considered chemical industries. They have also
updated their two inspection fact sheets.
Industry Fact Sheets
The four new industry fact sheets are for:
• Wineries;
• Breweries;
and
Sharp eyed readers will note that three of these are
included in the list of fact sheets that I mentioned in my earlier
blog post about the CFATS Outreach Implementation Plan FY 2018. The last three
fact sheets were reportedly released in 2017, but that I had not seen them published
on the CFATS web site. The pools and water parks sheet was not mentioned in the
earlier document. The lab factsheet that I had also mentioned earlier as not
having been seen was not included in today’s link publication.
Much of the information provided in the four fact sheets is
identical. Not surprisingly, the lists of ‘typical’ DHS chemicals of interest
(COI) used by the facilities is slightly different in each case. Three of the
factsheets (not the one for breweries) listed included brief comments about the
agricultural exemption; mainly for fertilizers applied to land associated with
the facility. The fisheries factsheet however, notes that fisheries and
hatcheries are not included in that exception.
Inspection Fact Sheet Updates
The two new inspection updates deal with preparing for:
• Authorization
Inspection; and
These are both complete re-writes of fact sheets written in 2014
and 2016
respectively. As with the previous versions, neither of these documents real
information valuable for passing of the respective inspections, but they both
provide valuable information that will be helpful in preparing for the conduct
of the inspections.
One interesting piece of information is included in the
compliance inspection fact sheet and it relates to the scheduling of those inspections.
It notes that:
“ISCD compares eight factors (seven
static and one dynamic) in an automated calculation to schedule CIs. Facilities
with a higher score are prioritized. Static factors included in this
calculation are a facility’s tier, number of planned measures [emphasis
added], the time since the last inspection, and compliance history. The eighth
factor changes based on new and emerging requirements.”
The issue of planned measures has been an issue since
compliance inspections were started in the CFATS program. ISCD gave facilities
credit for security measures that could not be implemented immediately for some
reason; usually dealing with capital expenditure, long lead time equipment and
the such. As long as the facility had budgeting in place and a firm schedule
for completion documented, credit was given for those measures in the approval
of the facility’s site security plan. During a large number of the initial compliance
inspections chemical security inspectors found that facilities were not complying
with their planned implementation schedules. While mitigation measures had to
be in place for these planned measures to be approved by ISCD, facilities would
not be fully secured until those planned measures were completed. ISCD is
obviously taking these planned security measures very seriously.
To my disappointment the Expedited
Approval Program appears to have been short changed in its mention in these
two documents. It is briefly mentioned in a footnote in the authorization
inspection document (mentioning that an authorization inspection is not
required), but it is completely missed in the compliance inspection fact sheet.
The consequences for a failed compliance inspection for EAP facilities is
completely different from those for a facility that has gone through the standard
site security plan approval process and should have been mentioned in the
compliance inspection fact sheet.
No comments:
Post a Comment