Over the last two days the OMB’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved two final rules (here and here)
submitted by the EPA supporting changes required by §6(b)
and §8(a)
of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (PL
114-182). The EPA has sent copies of those two final rules (here
and here)
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication. Those rules are not
scheduled for Monday publication, but they will almost certainly be published
next week.
It is unclear how much of a re-write these rules are from
the notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRMs) written by the Obama Administration (here
and here)
shortly before Trumps inauguration. I did not review those NPRMs at the time
because I was sure that there would either be new NPRMs published by the
incoming administration or complete rewrites in the final rulemaking. Whether
or not the rewrites here are legally justifiable will inevitably be determined
by the courts.
I will not start commenting on these rules until they are
published in the Federal Register. Other organizations have already started
their commenting process (see for example here),
but I prefer to wait because the formal publication allows me to link to
specific paragraphs in the rule and preamble. This allows people to better
understand what I am saying and check on my interpretations.
One point that I will comment upon. Both rules will become
effective upon publication. This is unusual, but it is a result of
congressionally mandated reporting requirements that become effective upon
publication. The EPA determined (rightly so in my opinion) that there was no
regulatory purpose to be served by adding a 60-day or 90-day effective date
when that would just cut into the 180-day reporting requirements in the bill.
There is, of course, the possibility that there could be a court stay of the
effective date, but that cannot change the mandated reporting schedule.
No comments:
Post a Comment