Showing posts with label TSCA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TSCA. Show all posts

Saturday, October 25, 2025

OMB Approves EPA PFAS TSCA Reporting NPRM

Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) from the EPA on “Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Data Reporting and Recordkeeping under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); Revision to Regulation”. The NPRM was sent to OMB on August 29th, 2025.

According to the entry for this rulemaking in the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda:

“The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is considering a proposed rule to amendments to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) regulation for reporting and recordkeeping requirements for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). As promulgated in October 2023, the regulation requires manufacturers (including importers) of PFAS in any year between 2011-2022 to report certain data to EPA related to exposure and environmental and health effects. EPA plans to propose the incorporation of certain exemptions and other modifications to the scope of the reporting rule.”                      

Generally, I do not cover TSCA rulemakings in any detail in this blog, and I do not expect this to be an exception to that rule. I will, at least, mention publication of this rule in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post.

Friday, September 19, 2025

OMB Concluded Action on EPA TSCA Risk Assessment NPRM – 9-18-25

Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affair (OIRA) announced that it had concluded action on a notice of proposed rulemaking from the EPA on “Further Reconsideration of Procedures for Chemical Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The NPRM was submitted to OIRA on August 4th, 2025.

According to the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“On May 3, 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) promulgated amendments to the procedural framework rule for conducting risk evaluations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The purpose of risk evaluations under TSCA is to determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment under its conditions of use, without consideration of costs or non-risk factors, including unreasonable risk to potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations identified as relevant to the risk evaluation by EPA. Some aspects of the 2024 amendments were necessary to align with court decisions from 2019. EPA is initiating further rulemaking to reexamine multiple aspects of the 2024 rulemaking for consistency with the law and Administration policy.”

The concluding action is listed as: “Statutory or Judicial Deadline”.

I do not expect to provide and detailed coverage of this rulemaking, but I will be announcing its publication in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post.

Friday, September 12, 2025

OMB Approves EPA TSCA TCE Extension IFR

Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved an interim final rule (IFR) on “Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); Compliance Date Extension”. The IFR was submitted to OIRA on September 4th, 2025. This rulemaking was not listed in the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda.

I do not expect to cover this IFR in any detail when it is published in the Federal Register in the coming weeks. At a minimum I will note its publication, however, in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post.

Friday, September 5, 2025

EPA Sends TCE TSCA Extension IFR to OMB

Yesterday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had received an interim final rule from the EPA on “Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); Compliance Date Extension”. That rulemaking was not listed in the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda (yes, finally published yesterday, more on that in separate blog posts).

The EPA published their final rule on TSCA regulation of TCE in December 2024. Not unexpectedly there was a joint resolution proposed (actually two resolutions: HJ Res 34 and SJ Res 19) that would have disapproved that final rule. No action has been taken on either resolution. This would seem to indicate that even some environmentally insensitive Republicans have some reservations about TCE safety.

The EPA has extended that deadline three separate times by notice in the Federal Register:

April 2nd, 2025,

June 23rd, 2025, and

August 20th, 2025


The current extension of the effective date runs through November 17th, 2025. Presumably the proposed IFR would provide for a longer extension and provide some additional research requirements on the EPA.

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

EPA Sends TSCA Risk Assessment NPRM to OMB – 8-4-25

Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had received a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) from the EPA on: “Further Reconsideration of Procedures for Chemical Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”.

This rulemaking was not listed in the Fall 2024 Unified Agenda, so it is difficult to discern the general intent and scope of the rulemaking before it is published. It looks like the ‘further reconsideration’ phrase in the title is in reference to a final EPA rulemaking published on May 3rd, 2024. That rulemaking was listed in the Fall 2023 Unified Agenda as the “Procedures for Chemical Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. At some level, that would make this an anti-Biden environmental rule.

I do not expect to provide and detailed coverage of this rulemaking, but I will be announcing its publication in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post.

Thursday, January 16, 2025

Review - EPA Publishes 30-day ICR Notice for Generic TSCA Risk Assessment RFI

Today the EPA published a 30-day ICR notice in the Federal Register (90 FR 4741-4742) for “Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Existing Chemical Risk Evaluation and Management: Generic Information Collection Request for Surveys (Renewal). The 60-day ICR notice was published on May 15th, 2024. This is the first renewal of this ICR (originally approved February 28th, 2022). Un-explained changes have been made in the burden estimate.

The table below shows the apparently ongoing revisions to the burden estimate for this ICR.


EPA uses this ‘generic’ ICR to collect information from industry, academia and the public to support their risk assessments under the TSCA Existing Chemical Risk Evaluation and Management program. They call this a ‘generic’ collection because it would be used for a variety of different chemical risk assessments.

Public Comments

The EPA is soliciting public comment on this ICR notice. Comments may be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (www.Regulations.gov; Docket # EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0611). Comments should be submitted by February 18th, 2025.

 

For more information on this ICR notice, including a look at the change in burden estimate, see my article at CFSN Detailed Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/epa-publishes-30-day-icr-notice-for - subscription required.

Thursday, December 5, 2024

OMB Approves EPA TCE TSCA Final Rule

Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a final rule from the EPA on “Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The final rule was sent to OIRA on July 18th, 2024. The notice of proposed rulemaking was published on October 31st, 2023.

According to the Spring 2024 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“On October 31, 2023, EPA issued a proposed rule to address the unreasonable risk of injury to human health presented by trichloroethylene (TCE) under its conditions of use as documented in EPA's November 2020 Risk Evaluation for TCE and January 2023 revised risk determination for TCE pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). TCE is widely used as a solvent in a variety of industrial, commercial and consumer applications including for hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) production, vapor and aerosol degreasing, and in lubricants, greases, adhesives, and sealants. TSCA requires that when EPA determines a chemical substance presents unreasonable risk that EPA address by rule the unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment and apply requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. EPA determined that TCE presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health due to the significant adverse health effects associated with exposure to TCE, including non-cancer effects (liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and developmental toxicity) as well as cancer (liver, kidney, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma) from chronic inhalation and dermal exposures to TCE. TCE is a neurotoxicant and is carcinogenic to humans by all routes of exposure. The most sensitive adverse effects of TCE exposure are non-cancer effects (developmental toxicity and immunosuppression) for acute exposures and developmental toxicity and autoimmunity for chronic exposures. To address the identified unreasonable risk, EPA is proposing to: prohibit all manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of TCE and industrial and commercial use of TCE for all uses, with longer compliance timeframes and workplace controls for certain processing and industrial and commercial uses (including proposed phaseouts and time-limited exemptions); prohibit the disposal of TCE to industrial pre-treatment, industrial treatment, or publicly owned treatment works, with a time-limited exemption for cleanup projects; and establish recordkeeping and downstream notification requirements.”

Again, (see Tuesday’s posts about EPA TSCA final rules here and here) this final rule will fall afoul of the incoming Trump Administration’s more hands off (slightly understated) approach to environmental regulations. With an effective date falling after January 20th, Trump will be able to effectively kill this rule with the stroke of a pen. If it had been published 30 days ago, it would have taken a full rulemaking process to overturn this regulation.

I will not (and even under ‘normal’ circumstances would not) cover this final rule in any detail. I will certainly announce its publication in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post.

Tuesday, December 3, 2024

OMB Approves EPA’s TSCA Update Final Rule

Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a final rule from the EPA on “Updates to New Chemicals Regulations Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The final rule was sent to OIRA on May 20th, 2024. The notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was published on May 26th, 2023.

According to the Spring 2024 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“EPA is reviewing public comments on the proposed amendments to the new chemicals procedural regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in 40 CFR parts 720, 721, 723, and 725. These amendments are intended to align the regulatory text with the statutory amendments that were made to TSCA in 2016 that impact the TSCA new chemicals review provisions, improve the efficiency of EPA's review processes, and update the regulations based on existing policies and experience implementing the New Chemicals Program. The proposal includes amendments that would reduce the need to redo all or part of the risk assessment by improving information initially submitted in new chemicals notices, which should also help reduce the length of time that new chemicals notices are under review. EPA is also proposing several amendments to the regulations for low volume exemptions (LVEs) and low release and exposure exemptions (LoREXs), which include requiring EPA approval of an exemption notice prior to commencement of manufacture, making per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) categorically ineligible for these exemptions, and providing that certain persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic (PBT) chemical substances are ineligible for these exemptions, consistent with EPA's 1999 PBT policy.”

There were 51 comments received by the EPA on the NPRM for this action. There were detailed comments from a wide range of industries, environmental organizations, and private individuals that the EPA had to address in writing this final rule. There will inevitably be changes made to the NPRM’s language.

This is another rule that will likely run afoul of President Trump’s less than supportive environmental agenda. See my earlier post for the likely outcome. So why publish this rule? It will give the 48th President, if environmentally inclined, a quick rule to put back into place to re-establish environmental controls erased by Trump.

I will probably not be covering this rulemaking in any detail. I will, at least, mention its publication in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ notice.

OMB Approves EPA PCE TSCA Final Rule

Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a final rule from the EPA on “Perchloroethylene (PCE); Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The final rule was sent to OIRA on May 30th, 2024. The notice of proposed rulemaking was published on June 16th, 2023.

According to the Spring 2024 Unified Agenda entry for the rulemaking:

“On June 16, 2023, EPA proposed a rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to address the unreasonable risk of injury to human health presented by perchloroethylene (PCE). PCE is a widely used solvent in a variety of occupational and consumer applications including fluorinated compound production, petroleum manufacturing, dry cleaning, and aerosol degreasing. EPA determined that PCE presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health due to the significant adverse health effects associated with exposure to PCE, including neurotoxicity effects from acute and chronic inhalation exposures and dermal exposures, and cancer from chronic inhalation exposures to PCE. TSCA requires that EPA address by rule any unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment identified in a TSCA risk evaluation and apply requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. PCE, also known as perc and tetrachloroethylene, is a neurotoxicant and a likely human carcinogen. Neurotoxicity, in particular impaired visual and cognitive function and diminished color discrimination, are the most sensitive adverse effects driving the unreasonable risk of PCE, and other adverse effects associated with exposure include central nervous system depression, kidney and liver effects, immune system toxicity, developmental toxicity, and cancer. To address the identified unreasonable risk, EPA is proposing to prohibit most industrial and commercial uses of PCE; the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of PCE for the prohibited industrial and commercial uses; the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of PCE for all consumer use; and, the manufacture (including import), processing, distribution in commerce, and use of PCE in dry cleaning and related spot cleaning through a 10-year phaseout. For certain conditions of use that would not be subject to a prohibition, EPA is also proposing to require a PCE workplace chemical protection program that includes requirements to meet an inhalation exposure concentration limit and prevent direct dermal contact. EPA is also proposing to require prescriptive workplace controls for laboratory use, and to establish recordkeeping and downstream notification requirements. Additionally, EPA proposes to provide certain time-limited exemptions from requirements for certain critical or essential emergency uses of PCE for which no technically and economically feasible safer alternative is available. The Agency’s development of this rule incorporated significant stakeholder outreach and public participation, including public webinars and over 40 external meetings as well as required Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations and a Small Businesses Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's risk evaluation for PCE, describing the conditions of use is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0502, with the 2022 unreasonable risk determination and additional materials in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0732.”

This final rule will almost certainly be negated by the Trump Administration soon after January 20th. An executive order stopping any number of regulations that have yet to become effective by January 20th is expected on January 20th, or 21st. Similar actions were taken by the incoming Biden Administration in January 2021. Rolling back other recently adopted regulations will take more time.

I do not expect to cover this rulemaking in any detail here, but I do expect to announce its publication in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post.

Saturday, October 26, 2024

OMB Approves EPA Final Rule on PBTC

Yesterday, OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a final rule from the EPA on “Decabromodiphenyl Ether and Phenol, Isopropylated Phosphate (3:1); Revision to the Regulations of Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The final rule was sent to OIRA on July 26th, 2024. The notice of proposed rulemaking was published on November 24th, 2023.

According to the Spring 2024 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing revisions to the regulations for decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) and phenol, isopropylated phosphate (3:1) (PIP (3:1)), two of the five persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) chemicals addressed in final rules issued under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in January 2021. After receiving additional comments following the issuance of the 2021 PBT final rules, the Agency has determined that revisions to the decaBDE and PIP (3:1) regulations are necessary to address implementation issues and to reduce further exposures. As required under TSCA, these proposed requirements would, if finalized, reduce the potential for exposures to humans and the environment to decaBDE and PIP (3:1) to the extent practicable. The Agency is not proposing to revise the existing regulations for the other three PBT chemicals (2,4,6-TTBP, HCBD, and PCTP) at this time.”


I will not be covering this final rule in any detail, but at the very least I will be announcing the publication in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post when it is published.

Saturday, July 27, 2024

EPA Sends PBT TSCA Final Rule to OMB

Yesterday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had received a final rule from the EPA on “Decabromodiphenyl Ether and Phenol, Isopropylated Phosphate (3:1); Revision to the Regulations of Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”.  The notice of proposed rulemaking for this action was published on November 24th, 2023.

According to the Spring 2024 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing revisions to the regulations for decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) and phenol, isopropylated phosphate (3:1) (PIP (3:1)), two of the five persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) chemicals addressed in final rules issued under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in January 2021. After receiving additional comments following the issuance of the 2021 PBT final rules, the Agency has determined that revisions to the decaBDE and PIP (3:1) regulations are necessary to address implementation issues and to reduce further exposures. As required under TSCA, these proposed requirements would, if finalized, reduce the potential for exposures to humans and the environment to decaBDE and PIP (3:1) to the extent practicable. The Agency is not proposing to revise the existing regulations for the other three PBT chemicals (2,4,6-TTBP, HCBD, and PCTP) at this time.”

The EPA has additional information available on their “Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) Chemicals under TSCA Section 6(h)” web page.

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

OMB Approves EPA 1-Bromopropane TSCA NPRM

Yesterday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a notice of proposed rulemaking from the EPA on “1-Bromopropane (1-BP); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The NPRM was submitted to OIRA on December 12th, 2023.

According to the Spring 2024 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“This proposed rulemaking will address the unreasonable risk of injury to health presented by 1-bromopropane (1-BP). Section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA address by rule any unreasonable risk identified in a TSCA risk evaluation and apply requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. The Agency’s development of this rule incorporates significant stakeholder outreach and public participation, including over 40 external meetings as well as required Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations and a Small Businesses Advocacy Review Panel. Specifically, EPA engaged in discussions with industry, non-governmental organizations, other government agencies, technical experts and users of 1-BP, and the general public to hear from users, academics, manufacturers, and members of the public health community about practices related to commercial uses of 1-BP. EPA's risk evaluation for 1-BP, describing the conditions of use, is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0235 [link added], with the 2022 unreasonable risk determination and additional materials in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0741 [link added].”

Additional information is available on the EPA’s Risk Evaluation for 1-Bromopropane (1-BP) web site.

As with most TSCA risk reduction rules, I will probably not cover this rulemaking in any detail. I will, however, at least mention it’s publication in the appropriate Short Takes post.

Saturday, July 20, 2024

EPA Sends TCE TSCA Final Rule to OMB

Thursday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA0 announced that it had received a final rule from the EPA on “Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The notice of proposed rulemaking was published on October 31st, 2023.

According to the Spring 2024 Unified Agenda Entry for this rulemaking:

“On October 31, 2023, EPA issued a proposed rule to address the unreasonable risk of injury to human health presented by trichloroethylene (TCE) under its conditions of use as documented in EPA's November 2020 Risk Evaluation for TCE and January 2023 revised risk determination for TCE pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). TCE is widely used as a solvent in a variety of industrial, commercial and consumer applications including for hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) production, vapor and aerosol degreasing, and in lubricants, greases, adhesives, and sealants. TSCA requires that when EPA determines a chemical substance presents unreasonable risk that EPA address by rule the unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment and apply requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. EPA determined that TCE presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health due to the significant adverse health effects associated with exposure to TCE, including non-cancer effects (liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and developmental toxicity) as well as cancer (liver, kidney, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma) from chronic inhalation and dermal exposures to TCE. TCE is a neurotoxicant and is carcinogenic to humans by all routes of exposure. The most sensitive adverse effects of TCE exposure are non-cancer effects (developmental toxicity and immunosuppression) for acute exposures and developmental toxicity and autoimmunity for chronic exposures. To address the identified unreasonable risk, EPA is proposing to: prohibit all manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of TCE and industrial and commercial use of TCE for all uses, with longer compliance timeframes and workplace controls for certain processing and industrial and commercial uses (including proposed phaseouts and time-limited exemptions); prohibit the disposal of TCE to industrial pre-treatment, industrial treatment, or publicly owned treatment works, with a time-limited exemption for cleanup projects; and establish recordkeeping and downstream notification requirements.”

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

EPA Sends Carbon Tetrachloride TSCA Final Rule to OMB

Yesterday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had received a final rule from the EPA on “Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC); Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The notice of proposed rulemaking on this action was published on July 28th, 2023.

According to the abstract for this rulemaking in the Fall 2023 Unified agenda:

“EPA determined that CTC presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health due to cancer from chronic inhalation and dermal exposures and liver toxicity from chronic inhalation, chronic dermal, and acute dermal exposures in the workplace. To address the identified unreasonable risk under TSCA, EPA proposed to establish workplace safety requirements for most conditions of use, including the condition of use related to the making of low Global Warming Potential (GWP) hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs), prohibit the manufacture (including import), processing, distribution in commerce, and industrial/commercial use of CTC for conditions of use where information indicates use of CTC has already been phased out, and establish recordkeeping and downstream notification requirements. The use of CTC in low GWP HFOs is particularly important in the Agency’s efforts to support the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 (AIM Act) and the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, which was ratified on October 26, 2022. The Agency’s development of this rule incorporates significant stakeholder outreach and public participation. EPA engaged in discussions with industry, non-governmental organizations, other government agencies, technical experts and users of CTC, and the general public to hear from users, academics, manufacturers, and members of the public health community about practices related to commercial uses of CTC; public health impacts of CTC; the importance of CTC in the various uses subject to this proposed rule; frequently-used substitute chemicals or alternative methods or lack thereof; engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment currently in use or feasibly adoptable; and other risk-reduction approaches that may have already been adopted or considered for industrial and commercial uses. EPA conducted Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations and a Small Businesses Advocacy Review Panel.  EPA's risk evaluation for CTC, describing CTC’s conditions of use, is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0499 [link added], with the December 2022 unreasonable risk determination and additional information in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0733 [link added].”

 

Friday, May 31, 2024

EPA Sends PCE TSCA Final Rule to OMB

Yesterday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had received a final rule form the EPA on Perchloroethylene (PCE); Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The notice of proposed rulemaking for this action was published on June 16th, 2023.

According to the Fall 2023 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“On June 16, 2023, EPA proposed a rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to address the unreasonable risk of injury to health from perchloroethylene (PCE). TSCA requires that EPA address by rule any unreasonable risk identified in a TSCA risk evaluation and apply requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. PCE is a widely used solvent in a variety of occupational and consumer applications including fluorinated compound production, petroleum manufacturing, dry cleaning, and aerosol degreasing. EPA determined that PCE presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health due to the significant adverse health effects associated with exposure to PCE, including neurotoxicity effects from acute and chronic inhalation exposures and dermal exposures, and cancer from chronic inhalation exposures to PCE. TSCA requires that EPA address by rule any unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment identified in a TSCA risk evaluation and apply requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. PCE, also known as perc and tetrachloroethylene, is a neurotoxicant and a likely human carcinogen. Neurotoxicity, in particular impaired visual and cognitive function and diminished color discrimination, are the most sensitive adverse effects driving the unreasonable risk of PCE, and other adverse effects associated with exposure include central nervous system depression, kidney and liver effects, immune system toxicity, developmental toxicity, and cancer. To address the identified unreasonable risk, EPA proposed to prohibit most industrial and commercial uses of PCE; the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of PCE for the prohibited industrial and commercial uses; the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of PCE for all consumer use; and, the manufacture (including import), processing, distribution in commerce, and use of PCE in dry cleaning and related spot cleaning through a 10-year phaseout. For certain conditions of use that would not be subject to a prohibition, EPA also proposed to require a PCE workplace chemical protection program that includes requirements to meet an inhalation exposure concentration limit and prevent direct dermal contact. EPA also proposed to require prescriptive workplace controls for laboratory use, and to establish recordkeeping and downstream notification requirements. Additionally, EPA proposed to provide certain time-limited exemptions from requirements for certain critical or essential emergency uses of PCE for which no technically and economically feasible safer alternative is available. The Agency’s development of this rule incorporated significant stakeholder outreach and public participation, including public webinars and over 40 external meetings as well as required Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations and a Small Businesses Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's risk evaluation for PCE, describing the conditions of use is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0502, with the 2022 unreasonable risk determination and additional materials in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0732.”

I am unlikely to cover this rulemaking in any detail. It’s publication, however, will be noted in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post. 

Wednesday, May 29, 2024

OMB Approves EPA’s N-Methylpyrrolidone NPRM

Yesterday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a notice of proposed rulemaking from the EPA on “N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP); Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The NPRM was submitted to OIRA on November 2nd, 2023.

According to the Fall 2023 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“This proposed rulemaking will address the unreasonable risk of injury to health presented by n-methylpyrrolidone (NMP). Section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA to address by rule any unreasonable risk identified in a TSCA section 6(b) risk evaluation by applying requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. The Agency’s development of this rule incorporates significant stakeholder outreach and public participation, including over 40 external meetings as well as required Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations and a Small Businesses Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's 2020 risk evaluation for NMP, describing its conditions of use is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0236, with the 2022 revised unreasonable risk determination and additional materials in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0743.6”

That entry also reports on the 2020 Risk Evaluation for NMP:

“The 2020 Risk Evaluation for NMP identified potential health effects for NMP including non-cancer adverse health effects such as liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, immunotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, neurotoxicity, and irritation and sensitization. In the 2022 Final Unreasonable Risk Determination, EPA determined that NMP presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health. The unreasonable risk determination is driven by risks to workers due to occupational exposures to NMP (i.e., during manufacture, processing, industrial and commercial uses, and disposal); and to consumers due to exposures from consumer use of NMP and NMP-containing products. For more information, visit: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-existing-chemicals-under-tsca.”

I will probably not cover this rulemaking in any depth, but it’s publication will almost certainly be announced in the appropriate ‘Short Takes’ post.

Tuesday, May 21, 2024

EPA Sends TSCA New Chemicals Update Final Rule to OMB

Yesterday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs announced that it had received a final rule from the EPA on Updates to New Chemicals Regulations Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was published on May 26th, 2023.

According to the Fall 2023 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“EPA is reviewing public comments on the proposed amendments to the new chemicals procedural regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). These amendments are intended to align the regulatory text with the amendments to TSCA's new chemicals review provisions contained in the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, enacted on June 22, 2016, improve the efficiency of EPA's review processes, and update the regulations based on existing policies and experience implementing the New Chemicals Program. The proposal includes amendments that would reduce the need to redo all or part of the risk assessment by improving information initially submitted in new chemicals notices, which should also help reduce the length of time that new chemicals notices are under review. EPA proposed several amendments to the regulations for low volume exemptions (LVEs) and low release and exposure exemptions (LoREXs), which include requiring EPA approval of an exemption notice prior to commencement of manufacture, making per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) categorically ineligible for these exemptions, and providing that certain persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic (PBT) chemical substances are ineligible for these exemptions, consistent with EPA's 1999 PBT policy.”

Thursday, April 18, 2024

OMB Approves EPA TSCA Risk Assessment Final Rule

Yesterday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had approved a final rule from the EPA on “Procedures for Chemical Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. This final rule was submitted to OIRA on March 5th, 2024. The notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was published on October 30th, 2023.

According to the Fall 2023 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“As required under section 6(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA published a final rule in 2017 that established a process for conducting risk evaluations to determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, without consideration of costs or other non-risk factors, including an unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation, under the conditions of use. This process incorporates the science requirements of the amended statute, including best available science and weight of the scientific evidence. The final rule established the steps of a risk evaluation process including: scope, hazard assessment, exposure assessment, risk characterization, and risk determination. The Agency has reconsidered the procedural framework rule for conducting such risk evaluations and determined that certain aspects of that framework should be revised to better align with applicable court decisions and the statutory text, to reflect the Agency’s experience implementing the risk evaluation program following enactment of the 2016 TSCA amendments, and to allow for consideration of future scientific advances in the risk evaluation process without need to further amend the Agency’s procedural rule.”

This rule could be published in the Federal Register in the next couple of weeks. I do not expect to fully cover the provisions of the rule, but I will not the publication of the final rule in the appropriate Short Takes post.

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

Review - EPA Publishes TSCA Health Data Request NPRM – 3-26-24

Today, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (89 FR 20918-20924) on “Certain Existing Chemicals; Request To Submit Unpublished Health and Safety Data Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The NPRM would amend 40 CFR 716.21(a), by adding a new paragraph (11) containing 16 new chemicals that would be subject to the health and safety data reporting requirements of §716.

The new chemicals include:

4,4-Methylene bis(2-chloraniline) (CASRN 101–14–4),

4-tert-octylphenol(4-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)-phenol) (CASRN140–66–9),

Acetaldehyde (CASRN75–07–0),

Acrylonitrile (CASRN 107–13–1),

Benzenamine (CASRN 62–53–3),-

Benzene (CASRN 71–43–2),

Bisphenol A (CASRN 80–05–7);

Ethylbenzene (CASRN 100–41–4),

Naphthalene (CASRN 91–20–3),

Vinyl Chloride (CASRN 75–01–4),

Styrene (CASRN 100–42–5),

Tribomomethane (Bromoform) (CASRN 75–25–2),

Triglycidyl isocyanurate; (CASRN 2451–62–9),

Hydrogen fluoride (CARN 7664–39–3),

N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N′-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (6PPD) (CASRN 793–24–8), and

2-anilino-5-[(4-methylpentan-2-yl) amino]cyclohexa-2,5-diene-1,4-dione (6PPD-quinone) (CASRN 2754428–18–5).

Public Comments

The EPA is soliciting public comments on the proposed rule. Comments may be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (www.Regulations.gov; Docket No EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0360). Comments should be submitted by May 28th, 2024.

 

For more details about the provisions of this NPRM, see my article at CFSN Detailed Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/epa-publishes-tsca-health-data-request - subscription required.

Wednesday, March 6, 2024

EPA Sends TSCA Risk Evaluation Final Rule to OMB

Yesterday, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it had received a final rule from the EPA on “Procedures for Chemical Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)”. The EPA published the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this action on October 30th, 2023.

According to the Fall 2023 Unified Agenda entry for this rulemaking:

“As required under section 6(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA published a final rule in 2017 that established a process for conducting risk evaluations to determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, without consideration of costs or other non-risk factors, including an unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation, under the conditions of use. This process incorporates the science requirements of the amended statute, including best available science and weight of the scientific evidence. The final rule established the steps of a risk evaluation process including: scope, hazard assessment, exposure assessment, risk characterization, and risk determination. The Agency has reconsidered the procedural framework rule for conducting such risk evaluations and determined that certain aspects of that framework should be revised to better align with applicable court decisions and the statutory text, to reflect the Agency’s experience implementing the risk evaluation program following enactment of the 2016 TSCA amendments, and to allow for consideration of future scientific advances in the risk evaluation process without need to further amend the Agency’s procedural rule.”

 
/* Use this with templates/template-twocol.html */