This is the second in a short series of blog posts about HR
244, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017. The initial post in the series
was:
This post deals with Division F of the bill, the Department
of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2017. This Division is generally based
upon the earlier appropriations bills from 114th Congress (HR
5634 and S
3001). As is typical with DHS appropriations bill, the programs of specific
interest to readers of this blog do not draw much in the way of specific
mention in the actual spending bill (or Division F in this instance). To gather
much in the way of information we have to look at the Explanatory
Statement for Division F, that effectively updates the Committee reports on
the earlier bills.
Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity is now a major reporting category under Title
III, Protection, Preparedness, Response, And Recovery, under the National
Preparedness and Programs Directorate. Table 1 below lays out the cybersecurity
operations and support funding outlined on pages 40-41. The CERT figures
probably include ICS-CERT and are part of the NCCIC funding.
|
Budget Estimate
|
Final Bill
|
Cyber Readiness
|
|
|
NCCIC Operations
|
$116,168,000
|
$108,402,000
|
(CERT)
|
(94,134,000)
|
(86,368,000)
|
NCCIC Planning
|
92,683,000
|
88,502,000
|
(CERT)
|
(65,788,000)
|
(61,607,000)
|
Cyber
Infrastructure
|
|
|
Cybersecurity Advisors
|
13,535,000
|
12,970,000
|
Enhanced Cybersecurity Services
|
16,830,000
|
16,950,000
|
Cybersecurity Education and Awareness
|
7,886,000
|
14,133,000
|
Federal
Cybersecurity
|
435,235,000
|
428,457,000
|
Total
|
$682,340,000
|
$669,414,000
|
Table 1:
Cybersecurity Spending
The budget numbers are from the Trump budget. The breakout
from the last Obama budget does not track well with these categories so it is
not reasonable to try to compare the two sets of numbers. Even where there are
similar category titles (CERT Operations for example) it is not necessarily the
same set of budget numbers.
There are no specific control system security related
comments in the Explanatory Statement. This is somewhat disappointing since the
Senate
Report on S3001 that noted (pg 98) increased spending (+$5 Million) on the
ICS-CERT ‘Training and Assessment’ account. I suspect that there will still be
an increase, but how much of that earlier amount remains to be seen.
Chemical Security
Again, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards
(CFATS) program is not large enough to be mentioned in HR 244. It does get a
line item in the Explanatory Statement and the numbers do mesh from the
previous bills; see Table 2.
|
Obama Budget
|
Trump Budget
|
Final
|
Infrastructure
Security Compliance
|
$78,667,000
|
$76,876,000
|
$69,557,000
|
Table 2: Chemical
Security
There is no explanation why the negotiators reduced the
CFATS program spending to levels below the $72 Million found in both of the
earlier House
and Senate Reports. Congress has had problems recently with ISCD being able to
fill the authorized Chemical Security Inspector slots, but that may not explain
this decrease; it may simply be cutting minor programs to provide money’s for
increasing other programs.
Surface Transportation
Surface transportation security falls under two different
agencies in DHS. The Coast Guard deals with the security of water
transportation and its related land based facilities under the Maritime
Transportation Security Act (MTSA). There is no mention of that program in
either HR 244 or the Explanatory Statement. On the government side this is a
very inexpensive program (relatively speaking).
The TSA is responsible for all of the other very limited DHS
surface transportation security programs. For purposes of this blog, this
includes pipeline, rail and truck transportation security. There is just a
single line item to cover all of the TSA surface transportation security
spending:
|
Obama Budget
|
Trump Budget
|
Final
|
Surface Transportation Security
|
$122,716,000
|
$122,716,000
|
$122,716,000
|
Table 3: Surface
Transportation Security
It really looks like everyone is just marking time on TSA
surface transportation operations. Kind of scary looking at the history of
attacks on surface transportation across the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment