Congress heads back to Washington today to start their lame
duck session. What will be accomplished in this session is more up in the air
than normal because of the unexpected (by most folks) results of last week’s
election. The hearing schedule is pretty light this week (and will probably
change as the week progresses) with only one hearing of possible specific
interest to readers of this blog.
Automated Vehicles
On Wednesday, the Transportation, Housing and Urban
Development, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations
Committee will hold a hearing on “The Automated & Self-Driving Vehicle
Revolution: What Is the Role of Government?” The witness list includes:
• Mark Rosekind, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration;
• Deborah Hersman, National Safety Council;
• Paul Brubaker, The Alliance for Transportation Innovation;
and
•
Nidhi Kalra, RAND Center for Decision Making Under Uncertainty
On the Floor
Nothing of specific interest to readers of this blog is
currently scheduled
to make it to the floor of the House this week. I do want to briefly mention
one bill, however, that will be considered under a rule this Wednesday; HR 5982,
Midnight Rules Relief Act of 2016.
This bill is being touted as a way to stop some of the last
minute regulations being promulgated by the outgoing Obama Administration.
While it looks like it targets any regulation issued in the last year of an
outgoing Administration, it does nothing to change the 60-day requirement for
the introduction of a joint resolution of disapproval in 5
USC 802(a). It may make it easier to obtain a favorable vote on such a
resolution (and more importantly on a subsequent veto override vote) by
bundling a number of rules into the same resolution. Such bundling could
provide for some vote trading to get enough votes to override a presidential
veto.
Veto overrides are tough (especially in the current congressional
split). That means that for these disapproval resolutions to really be
effective is for the approved bill to be sent to the new President for signing,
evading the possibility of a veto. This effectively means that only regulations
published in the last two months of the outgoing administration really have any
real chance of being cancelled by Congress in this manner. This is one of the
reasons that the Obama Administration’s OMB has been trying real hard to ensure
that any potentially offensive regulations have already been published.
No comments:
Post a Comment