Part of the work that I do to keep up to date on programs
that I write about here on this blog is to periodically check a number of web
sites to see what changes have been made. One of the web sites that I check
every Saturday is the web site for the TSA’s Sensitive Security Information
(SSI) program. I’m not providing the link (okay
I will) to that site since it no longer exists and hasn’t for three weeks
now.
It was an information packed site. It provided links to program
documents, explanations of terms, training requirements; all sorts of good
information that anyone dealing with SSI would like to have handy to make sure
that they were compliant with the regulations.
The first weekend that it was down (and I’m not talking
about a standard 404 error message, but a nice pretty TSA ‘Page Not Found’
message) I wrote it off as one of those glitches that periodically happens on
the internet. The second week I fired off a request to TSA asking about what
was going on with their SSI web site. This week I got a very nice email from
the SSI folks. It explained that:
“TSA recently deployed a new
website which could only contain 508-compliant material. The SSI Program is
currently working with Public Affairs to convert our programmatic content so
that it is 508-compliant and may be loaded to the site.”
For those of you who do not readily understand government
speak the term ‘508-compliant material’ refers to the requirements of §508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 (29
USC 794d) as amended in 1992 by §509
of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992 (PL 102-569).
In short the Federal government is required to provide equal access to
information to people with disabilities. In this particular instance I would
presume that that means people who cannot see the information on the web pages.
Now TSA information on the internet is hard enough to access
for people with perfect vision, I can only imagine how hard it would be to find
anything TSA related if I were visually impaired. So I whole heartedly endorse
anything that makes access to this information easier for anyone, particularly
those with physical disabilities.
What I find hard to understand, however, is how TSA could
have deployed a new disability friendly web site without ensuring that all of
the content was §508
compliant first. That does not make any sense to me.
Because of that inexcusable oversight we have gone at least
three weeks now without information being available on this critical security
program. The average small to medium business does not have professionals on
staff that are fully up to speed on each and every Federal security program and
it is sites like this currently missing site that made it possible for such
enterprises to have some hope of complying with Federal mandates.
The SSI program is especially important when it comes to
companies sharing security information with the Federal government. It is only
possible for companies to protect security information that they share from
public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act if they properly request
that the information be considered SSI. If an organization does not properly
request SSI information protection of data shared with the government then it
is not protected.
Without this site being available, the average small to
medium company is not going to have a reasonable way of knowing how to protect
their transportation security related information from public disclosure when
it is shared with a Federal government agency.
There is currently no information available on how long it
is going to take the TSA to convert their SSI program information to a §508 compliant format. In
the meantime, the friendly email I received did provide an email point (SSI@tsa.dhs.gov) of contact for anyone
needing information on SSI program needs. Of course, that isn’t a very large
office and too many information requests will prevent them from doing their
other SSI related work. It sure would be nicer if the web site had not been
taken down.
1 comment:
Thanks for this info on TSA's SSI web pages. Did anyone explain how *removing* information, 508-compliant or otherwise, is going to *help* people who 508 is supposed to benefit? Surely the vision-impaired users can get more info (presumably by using an intermediary, which is an admittedly non-ideal condition) from an available 508 NON-compliant web page than from all the 508-compliant pages in the world!
Post a Comment